--- On Tue, 11/8/09, Sam Vekemans acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com wrote:
So anyway, i propose to add
surface=gravel;dirt;grass;concrete, to go
along side highway=value. (which listed more generally,
what the way
is generally used for (type of travel between 2 points)
Umm someone already has
Hi,
Are you referring to the JOSM presets? As for some reason the only
values they include for surface are paved / unpaved / cobblestone.
If so, I would agree would that there should be some more options
available, at least some of the common values, eg gravel, dirt, grass,
concrete
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:31:38AM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
... and it is NOT assumed surface=paved. .. we don't ASSUME :) .. instead
we have If no other values of surface is listed, the default value is
surface=paved ... but actually, it should be surface=undefined, as the
On Friday 14 August 2009 00:31:38 Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/8/13 Sam Vekemans acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com:
surface earth Probably the same as surface=ground
should be change to the same as surface=dirt
yes, clean up a little bit: dirt, mud, earth, ground seem all the same
to me (I
2009/8/14 Blaž Lorger blaz.lor...@triera.net:
I usually tag paved road segment adjacent to unpaved road segment as paved.
Otherwise it is all too easy to combine road segments without any warning from
editor.
I often do the same, if I got the impression that it is not completely
clear from the
2009/8/14 Florian Lohoff f...@rfc822.org:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:31:38AM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
type of ways - I see a lot of bloat coming when people start tagging
access = yes
bicycle = yes
foot = yes
layer = 0
maxspeed = 30
Le vendredi 14 août 2009 à 15:02, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit :
but IMHO it is an error in the editors not to warn
you, if tags are added in a combine-action (not only on contradictory
tags should warn). I already filed a trac-ticket for JOSM some time
ago.
+1
I've had the problem some month
2009/8/13 Sam Vekemans acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com:
surface earth Probably the same as surface=ground
should be change to the same as surface=dirt
yes, clean up a little bit: dirt, mud, earth, ground seem all the same
to me (I personally prefer ground).
... and it is NOT assumed
On 12/08/2009 01:41, Sam Vekemans wrote:
This is where my national headache begins. (surface=smoothISH)
If we simply have the default options to list 'gravel' 'dirt'
'concrete', because 'unpaved' is rather ill-defined. It just indicates
'paved_ash_fault=no', but doesn't go further.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Craig Wallace craig...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On 12/08/2009 01:41, Sam Vekemans wrote:
This is where my national headache begins. (surface=smoothISH)
If we simply have the default options to list 'gravel' 'dirt'
'concrete', because 'unpaved' is rather
Thread: Sam Vekemans (12/08/2009) Craig Wallace (12/08/2009) Sam
Vekemans (12/08/2009)
Regarding excerpt:
Yes, that is exactly what i am referring too.
We ALSO need to have a special wiki page (that lists each of these things,
and how they are rendered, and used. This will alleviate the
Hi all,
That 90 message thread on highway=path and highway=footway;cycleway
has gone on too long IMO.
Multi-use path; greenway
In Canada we have this multi-use Greenway where trails are not
actually designated:use specific, but rather, just listed as a 'path'
with a surface type. Then, we add in
--- On Tue, 11/8/09, Sam Vekemans acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com wrote:
So anyway, i propose to add
surface=gravel;dirt;grass;concrete, to go
along side highway=value. (which listed more generally,
what the way
is generally used for (type of travel between 2 points)
Umm someone already has
On 08/11/2009 07:41 PM, Sam Vekemans wrote:
So anyway, i propose to add surface=gravel;dirt;grass;concrete, to go
along side highway=value. (which listed more generally, what the way
is generally used for (type of travel between 2 points)
We already have those values, see
14 matches
Mail list logo
