Re: [OSM-talk-fr] OpenStreetMap dans « Libre à vous ! » - demain mardi 11 juin sur radio Cause Commune

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Jean-Christophe Becquet
Le 11/06/2019 21:30, osm.sanspourr...@spamgourmet.com a écrit : > Il y a mensonge sur le programme ou la rediffusion n'est pas le même jour ? > > Je lis "Et l'émission sera rediffusée le soir même de 21 h à 22 h 30." > mais ce n'est point ce que j'entends. Bonjour, L'émission est rediffusée le

Re: [Talk-at] Schule für Shiatsu

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Stefan Tauner via Talk-at
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:19:10 +0200 Christian Aigner wrote: > Werte Kolleginnen und Kollegen! > > Ich bin gerade dabei, eine Schule für Shiatsu-Ausbildung einzutragen. > > Was nehme ich da am besten? > > amenity=school > > oder die Kombination > > amenity=education > education=shiatsu > >

[OSM-ja] 7/7 京都!街歩き!マッピングパーティ:第10回 清凉寺

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden yasunari yamashita
山下です。皆さんこんにちわ。 7月の京都!街歩き!マッピングパーティは、七夕様の7日に 光源氏が造営した「嵯峨の御堂」に目される寺院 清凉寺(嵯峨釈迦堂)をターゲットに開催します。 https://openstreetmap-kyoto.connpass.com/event/135595/ いつでも行ける嵯峨釈迦堂、なのに何か機会でもないと、 なかなか訪れることがありません(京都あるある)。 私も二年ぶりぐらいでしょうか。。。 いつでも行ける 京都!街歩き!マッピングパーティ 皆様の参加をお待ちしています! -- 山下康成@京都府向日市

Re: [Talk-at] Sammelrelationen XX in YY

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Friedrich Volkmann
On 15.06.19 00:52, Robert Grübler wrote: Generell ist es ja mit Relationen sind keine Kategorien (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relationen/Relationen_sind_keine_Kategorien ) beantwortet. Das ist derselbe Link, den ich schon im ersten Beitrag gepostet habe, nur diesmal in der

Re: [Talk-at] Sammelrelationen XX in YY

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Robert Grübler
Friedrich Volkmann schrieb am Freitag, 14. Juni 2019 21:15: > Das sind teils uralte Relationen mit unzähligen Bearbeitern. > Mir geht es jetzt erst mal um eine Grundsatzdiskussion, > also ob wir solche Relationen grundsätzlich haben wollen. > Erst wenn wir zu einem Konsens kommen, dass wir

Re: [Talk-GB] GPS devices

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden James Harrison
On 14/06/2019 20:56, Simon Ritchie wrote: > > I'm currently evaluating the Emlid Reach M+ device.  It's a lovely > little thing, powered through the USB so can be run using a mobile phone > power bank.  It has Bluetooth and uses your laptop or smartphone as a > display and Internet connection. 

Re: [Talk-us] Need someone in the south to review an edit

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Rihards
On 14.06.19 17:59, Micah Cochran wrote: > > One of the following changeset comments suggests the deletions in this > changeset are to remove duplicates added by mistake previously. > > > I checked the a few local locations of the business (Athens, Alabama).  > There are still nodes/ways

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Osmose erreurs#1270

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden ades
faudrait d’abord demander aux Vénitiens comment ils appellent ça ;-) Je ne taguerai pas ça comme quai, où sont les éléments constitutifs d’un quai : anneaux, bites, etc. ? Et je pense que même si ça peut servir de point d’embarquement ce n’est pas un quai. Là on a juste la fin d’une rue. Que

[Talk-GB] GPS devices

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Simon Ritchie
What GPS devices are people out there using, and how accurate are they? I'm currently evaluating the Emlid Reach M+ device. It's a lovely little thing, powered through the USB so can be run using a mobile phone power bank. It has Bluetooth and uses your laptop or smartphone as a display and

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Osmose erreurs#1270

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden osm . sanspourriel
Vu l'usage et l'absence de parapet/barrière je n'hésiterais pas : c'est un quai. C'est fait pour servir de quai et non pour éviter que la rue ne tombe ^^ Le 14/06/2019 à 09:58, marc marc - marc_marc_...@hotmail.com a écrit : Le 14.06.19 à 08:39, lenny.libre a écrit : j'hésite encore entre le

Re: [Talk-at] Sammelrelationen XX in YY

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Friedrich Volkmann
On 14.06.19 19:04, Robert Grübler wrote: @Friedrich Hast du schon die Ersteller/Pfleger der Relationen angesprochen und ihre Argumente eingeholt? Das sind teils uralte Relationen mit unzähligen Bearbeitern. Mir geht es jetzt erst mal um eine Grundsatzdiskussion, also ob wir solche

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed mechanical edit - remove blatant duplicates (sustenance=fast_food on amenity=fast_food, atm=yes on amenity=atm etc.)

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Yves
It isn't worth it, I'm afraid you're loosing your time. Given that the two tags aren't the same (amenity=atm is an atm, atm=yes contains an atm) you'll soon have this one art piece that definitely deserves amenity=atm + atm=no. Or not. If you're not ready to consume OSM data using NOT, AND or

[OSM-talk-fr] proposition tourism=camp_pitch

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Bibi via Talk-fr
Bonjour, ça se passe par là : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:tourism%3Dcamp_pitch#Voting Bonjour, comme les propositions complexes échouent, ici une proposition toute simple : mettre les emplacements de camping sous la clé tourism comme ça la clé camp_site peut restée

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed mechanical edit - remove blatant duplicates (sustenance=fast_food on amenity=fast_food, atm=yes on amenity=atm etc.)

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Mark Wagner
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:02:59 +0100 Dave F via talk wrote: > On 14/06/2019 07:57, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > Edits would be split to not create overly large bounding boxes. > > As long as it's clearly commented, I wouldn't loose any sleep over > the physical size of the changeset. OSM should

Re: [Talk-at] Sammelrelationen XX in YY

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Robert Grübler
@Friedrich Hast du schon die Ersteller/Pfleger der Relationen angesprochen und ihre Argumente eingeholt? @Norbert Probier mal „Who’s around me “ (http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/oooc) für deine Gegend. LG Robert Von: norbert baldia

Re: [Talk-us] Need someone in the south to review an edit

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Andy Townsend
On 14/06/2019 16:56, Paul Johnson wrote: Aaah, OK.  Would have been nice if Brandify Tran replied to changeset comments. With a DWG hat on I'll send them a "message that they have to read before continuing to edit" and ask them to check their registered email account. Best Regards, Andy

Re: [Talk-us] Need someone in the south to review an edit

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Paul Johnson
Aaah, OK. Would have been nice if Brandify Tran replied to changeset comments. On Fri, Jun 14, 2019, 10:01 Micah Cochran wrote: > >> One of the following changeset comments suggests the deletions in this >> changeset are to remove duplicates added by mistake previously. >> >> > I checked the a

Re: [Talk-it] Source dubbio

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Andrea Musuruane
Hi Andy, On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 10:56 PM Andy Townsend wrote: > Hello, > > Andy from the DWG here. Apologies for the delay in getting around to this. > > (automatic translation into Italian below) > > Currently as I understand it: > >1. The licence under which this data was released isn't

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed mechanical edit - remove blatant duplicates (sustenance=fast_food on amenity=fast_food, atm=yes on amenity=atm etc.)

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Jmapb
On 6/14/2019 9:50 AM, Dave F via talk wrote: On 14/06/2019 14:10, Jmapb wrote:  If there's a problem with a well-thought-out mechanical edit, it's highly likely to be localized, For mechanical/bot/automated edits, errors are more likely to be duplicated across all amendments. If 'local

Re: [Talk-us] Need someone in the south to review an edit

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Micah Cochran
> > > One of the following changeset comments suggests the deletions in this > changeset are to remove duplicates added by mistake previously. > > I checked the a few local locations of the business (Athens, Alabama). There are still nodes/ways for the "Express Oil Change" locations, which would

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed mechanical edit - remove blatant duplicates (sustenance=fast_food on amenity=fast_food, atm=yes on amenity=atm etc.)

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Mateusz Konieczny
14 Jun 2019, 14:55 by dieterdre...@gmail.com: > Looking at the actual sustenance values (total usage around 200 only), these > are all duplicating words which are already tagged as amenity values > (restaurant, fast_food etc.), I also haven't found specific documentation for > this key (and

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed mechanical edit - remove blatant duplicates (sustenance=fast_food on amenity=fast_food, atm=yes on amenity=atm etc.)

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Dave F via talk
On 14/06/2019 14:10, Jmapb wrote:  If there's a problem with a well-thought-out mechanical edit, it's highly likely to be localized, For mechanical/bot/automated edits, errors are more likely to be duplicated across all amendments. If 'local mapping communities' have 'different ideas' it

Re: [Talk-it] R: R: R: Casette captazione acqua

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Martin Koppenhoefer
Am Do., 13. Juni 2019 um 20:10 Uhr schrieb angelo mornata < angelo.morn...@hotmail.it>: > Scusa Martin ma pensavo che la questione fosse chiusa, a questo punto è > meglio spiegare quando vengono fatte e come, queste protezioni. > Quando si decide che un a sorgente d'acqua può avere un interesse >

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed mechanical edit - remove blatant duplicates (sustenance=fast_food on amenity=fast_food, atm=yes on amenity=atm etc.)

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Jmapb
On 6/14/2019 5:02 AM, Dave F via talk wrote: That the main website is antiquated & unable to display details of edits is not a reason to improve the database efficiently. Performing edits in one go makes them easier to keep track of & revert, if there's a problem. DaveF IMO, smaller and more

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed mechanical edit - remove blatant duplicates (sustenance=fast_food on amenity=fast_food, atm=yes on amenity=atm etc.)

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Martin Koppenhoefer
Am Fr., 14. Juni 2019 um 09:00 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny < matkoni...@tutanota.com>: > So in total I propose to remove > > atm=yes from amenity=atm http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JW8 > transportation=fuel from amenity=fuel http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JWe > sustenance=restaurant from

Re: [Talk-GB] OS Open Greenspace tileset

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 10:24, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > I've put together a simple tileset showing greenspace areas from Ordnance > Survey's recent OS Open Greenspace release. The data is released under the > standard OS open licence therefore suitable for tracing in OSM. > > Many features are

Re: [Talk-pt] Relações em urbanização

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Nuno Caldeira
vê este vídeo para acelerar o processo https://youtu.be/tELDooPvJ0s não precisas adicionar relações. se o edifício tem uma só função, podes deixar o polígono com a etiqueta da função. caso tenha mais que uma função, deixas a etiqueta de edifício no polígono e adicionas o ponto da outra função

Re: [Talk-GB] OS Open Greenspace tileset

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Jez Nicholson
Nice. When they released OS Open Greenspace it immediately made me shout. There are lots of places that they don't regard as greenspace that clearly are, plus there are nuances. Can you tell from the render which areas are pulled in from OSM? I'm comparing the layers in JOSM and can see when an

Re: [Talk-us] Need someone in the south to review an edit

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Shawn K. Quinn
On 6/13/19 23:29, Paul Johnson wrote: > Brandify put up a rather suspicious mass deletion > recently.  I suspect > that one of their customers stopped paying/had a term contract that > expired and Brandify mass-deleted the entire chain.  But it is

[Talk-GB] OS Open Greenspace tileset

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Richard Fairhurst
Hi all, I've put together a simple tileset showing greenspace areas from Ordnance Survey's recent OS Open Greenspace release. The data is released under the standard OS open licence therefore suitable for tracing in OSM. Many features are already in OSM, but not all, and in addition the names

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed mechanical edit - remove blatant duplicates (sustenance=fast_food on amenity=fast_food, atm=yes on amenity=atm etc.)

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Dave F via talk
On 14/06/2019 07:57, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: Edits would be split to not create overly large bounding boxes. As long as it's clearly commented, I wouldn't loose any sleep over the physical size of the changeset. OSM should be concerning itself with quality rather than quantity. That the

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed mechanical edit - remove blatant duplicates (sustenance=fast_food on amenity=fast_food, atm=yes on amenity=atm etc.)

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Dave F via talk
It's taken you longer to write your email than it would to write a line of extra code to search for them. Easier to distinguish between the two: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JWq DaveF On 14/06/2019 08:27, Johnparis wrote: For ATMs, at least, I would propose the opposite: add the atm=yes tag to

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed mechanical edit - remove blatant duplicates (sustenance=fast_food on amenity=fast_food, atm=yes on amenity=atm etc.)

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Simon Poole
Please no. Essentially you are saying that all attribute tags that indicate that a specific facility is present should be duplicated on the standalone objects of the same type. bin=yes on amenity=waste_basket, bench=yes on amenity=bench and so on. Am 14.06.2019 um 09:27 schrieb Johnparis: > For

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed mechanical edit - remove blatant duplicates (sustenance=fast_food on amenity=fast_food, atm=yes on amenity=atm etc.)

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 14.06.19 08:57, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > So in total I propose to remove [...] Makes sense to me. Please document it on the wiki as per the automated editing guidlines, "You should normally document your proposed edit at an English-language wiki page named "Automated edits/username"

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Osmose erreurs#1270

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden marc marc
Le 14.06.19 à 08:39, lenny.libre a écrit : > j'hésite encore entre le noexit et le "man_made=quay" > https://goo.gl/maps/ezwLyzp122JTQD2U9 j'opterais pour un quai ou un mur de soutènement ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed mechanical edit - remove blatant duplicates (sustenance=fast_food on amenity=fast_food, atm=yes on amenity=atm etc.)

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Andrew Harvey
I think this proposed edit is reasonable, it makes things simpler without loosing any information. On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 17:30, Johnparis wrote: > From a user perspective, I want to be able to search for atm=yes to obtain > all the nearby ATMs. Removing this tag leaves me without standalone

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed mechanical edit - remove blatant duplicates (sustenance=fast_food on amenity=fast_food, atm=yes on amenity=atm etc.)

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 14. Jun 2019, at 09:27, Johnparis wrote: > > For ATMs, at least, I would propose the opposite: add the atm=yes tag to all > amenity=atm this doesn‘t seem reasonable, atm=yes is a property to state that the feature provides an atm. With amenity=yes it is already

Re: [Talk-at] Sammelrelationen XX in YY

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden norbert baldia
Lieber Friedrich!   Im Zusammenhang mit "Sammelrelation" - Wanderwege Türnitzer Alpen - würde ich gerne damit in Kontakt treten. Ich suche schon lange einen OSM-Kollegen aus diesem Raum, der mir, einem eher ungeübten OSM-Beiträger, einige unterstützende praktische Anwendungen erklärt.   Mit

[talk-cz] WeeklyOSM CZ 462

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Tom Ka
Ahoj, je dostupné vydání 462 týdeníku WeeklyOSM: https://weeklyosm.eu/cz/archives/12140 * Aktualizace Strava CZ/SK. * Problémy s mosty 3D. * Novinky OsmHiCheck. * Tagování zaniklé obce. * Lepší tagování jízdních pruhů. * Problémy s editorem iD. * Firemní editoři v OSM. * Lístky na SotM 2019. *

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed mechanical edit - remove blatant duplicates (sustenance=fast_food on amenity=fast_food, atm=yes on amenity=atm etc.)

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Johnparis
For ATMs, at least, I would propose the opposite: add the atm=yes tag to all amenity=atm >From a user perspective, I want to be able to search for atm=yes to obtain all the nearby ATMs. Removing this tag leaves me without standalone ATMs, so I would have to search for atm=yes OR amenity=atm

[Talk-at] Schule für Shiatsu

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Christian Aigner
Werte Kolleginnen und Kollegen! Ich bin gerade dabei, eine Schule für Shiatsu-Ausbildung einzutragen. Was nehme ich da am besten? amenity=school oder die Kombination amenity=education education=shiatsu Oder gar etwas anderes? Wie würdet ihr das eintragen? Mit besten Grüßen, Christian

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Osmose erreurs#1270

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden lenny.libre
Le 13/06/2019 à 20:10, deuzeffe a écrit : On 13/06/2019 17:45, marc marc wrote: Donc erreur à signaler à osmose ? à la place d'osmose, j'ignorerais tout ce qui touche aux highway surfacique, c'est trop immature. mais sinon oui tu peux essayer de proposer que freed fasse une rustine sur la

[OSM-talk] Proposed mechanical edit - remove blatant duplicates (sustenance=fast_food on amenity=fast_food, atm=yes on amenity=atm etc.)

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Mateusz Konieczny
Recently in mapping I encountered amenity=atm with atm=yes I manually removed atm=yes, but it turns that there is more of such objects. I propose to run an automatic edit that will remove atm=yes from all such objects. In addition I propose to remove also some other blatant and unnecessary

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Osmose erreurs#1270

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden lenny.libre
Le 13/06/2019 à 17:45, marc marc a écrit : Le 13.06.19 à 17:09, lenny.libre a écrit : Le 13/06/2019 à 12:53, marc marc a écrit : Le 13.06.19 à 12:44, lenny.libre a écrit : Est-ce le "area=yes" qui perturbe Osmose c'est la conclusion à laquelle je suis arrivée Donc erreur à signaler à

[Talk-at] Sammelrelationen XX in YY

2019-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Friedrich Volkmann
Anlässlich der Relation 9463022 ("Wanderege Türnitzer Alpen") kommt mir vor, dass diese Art von Relationen überhandnimmt. Im selben Editorfenster werden mir zufällig auch eine Relation 7293702 "Landesstraßen B in Niederösterreich" und 939634 "Österreichische Bundesstraßen" gelistet. Letztere