Settlements which are mapped with the place=* key are usually mapped as a
node, not as an area.
There are many place=city areas in the USA, but that's because the tag was
incorrectly added to many municipal boundaries when they were first
imported, years ago.
Some neighborhoods have well-defined
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 9:27 PM stevea wrote:
> On Sep 22, 2020, at 7:05 PM, Clifford Snow
> wrote:
> > For example, in Seattle I lived in the Wallingford Neighborhood. Seattle
> has defined boundaries for each of the neighborhoods. In other areas,
> neighborhoods are roughly defined by people
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 8:56 PM stevea wrote:
> If you MUST tag place=neighbourhood (note the u) see if you agree with me
> that this tag makes most sense in a hierarchy where place=suburb (and
> perhaps quarter, if applicable, is/are above) also exist(s). I'm not
> strictly saying I believe
Sep 22, 2020, 23:43 by gi...@gmx.de:
> Hello OSMF Legal Team,
>
> due to a quite troubling revelation by @SomeoneElse that changeset comments
> are
> automatically republished by the third party private company Slack, I would
> appreciate if you could share your legal assessment of this
On Sep 22, 2020, at 7:05 PM, Clifford Snow wrote:
> For example, in Seattle I lived in the Wallingford Neighborhood. Seattle has
> defined boundaries for each of the neighborhoods. In other areas,
> neighborhoods are roughly defined by people living there. In those cases
> using a place= tag
Whoops, "but NOT if it isn't something like a council"
SteveA
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Clifford: I certainly agree with you if (and likely only if) there is
something like a neighborhood council that actually has some sort of
"administrative" function (which could be as "lowly" as dog catcher, mosquito
abatement, or "sub-municipal parks department for these three neighborhood
Steve,
If the boundaries exist, you could use admin_level=10.
Most of the neighborhoods I'm familiar with are just small subdivisions
within the city. For example, in Seattle I lived in the Wallingford
Neighborhood. Seattle has defined boundaries for each of the neighborhoods.
In other areas,
If you MUST tag place=neighbourhood (note the u) see if you agree with me that
this tag makes most sense in a hierarchy where place=suburb (and perhaps
quarter, if applicable, is/are above) also exist(s). I'm not strictly saying I
believe that place=neighbourhood CANNOT exist without
Hi GITNE,
Can you also specify what you think the problem is? I get the feeling that
you have an objection to changeset comments being posted in Slack. I'm
assuming such comments appear in the OSMUS slack group which is popular
with mappers. Why do you think this is a bad thing?
(To be clear, I
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 8:36 PM Mike N wrote:
> On 9/22/2020 9:26 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > The extra hamlet nodes are import remainders that haven't yet
> been
> > converted to landuse areas. The general landuse zones for that area
> > have been identified, but do not
On 9/22/2020 9:26 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
The extra hamlet nodes are import remainders that haven't yet been
converted to landuse areas. The general landuse zones for that area
have been identified, but do not exactly correspond to the named
subdivisions. As I get a
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 8:20 PM Mike N wrote:
> On 9/22/2020 8:56 PM, Karson Sommer wrote:
> >
> > Looking around the area of the edit, there is a lot of stuff from my
> > perspective that seems fishy. There are a bunch of place=hamlet nodes? I
> > certainly don't see anything that should be
On 9/22/2020 8:56 PM, Karson Sommer wrote:
Looking around the area of the edit, there is a lot of stuff from my
perspective that seems fishy. There are a bunch of place=hamlet nodes? I
certainly don't see anything that should be tagged as a hamlet, they all
look like place=neighborhood to
I'm harmonious with Minh's comments in the changeset.
The place key, with value suburb, has quite specific meanings, I don't think
these are those. And as we don't or shouldn't be truly precise and especially
not authoritative with "legal subdivisions," I think the "more informal" nature
of
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 7:14 PM Mike N wrote:
> Thoughts on use of place=neighborhood for subdivisions?
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91255294
>
>Note that there are many thousands already tagged this way (5000 plus
> in a section of the southeast alone).
I'd consider a
I agree with the way it was already mapped. Subdivisions should be mapped
as areas tagged with landuse=residential, place=neighborhood, and name=* if
it is named.
Looking around the area of the edit, there is a lot of stuff from my
perspective that seems fishy. There are a bunch of place=hamlet
I’ve seen it used that way. I don’t see anything wrong with it, so long as it’s actually a named place that people would refer to, as opposed to a cadastral unit. If the subdivision has one of those signs at the entrance, or locals know what you mean when someone says they live in “Hickory Creek”,
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 2:43 PM GITNE wrote:
> Hello OSMF Legal Team,
>
> due to a quite troubling revelation by @SomeoneElse that changeset
> comments are
> automatically republished by the third party private company Slack, I would
> appreciate if you could share your legal assessment of this
Thoughts on use of place=neighborhood for subdivisions?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91255294
Note that there are many thousands already tagged this way (5000 plus
in a section of the southeast alone).
___
Talk-us mailing list
Hola
Por lo pronto en este conjunto de cambios 91320456 [0] ha continuado con
el mismo patrón de eliminar vías por la zona donde va a agregar
edificios y muros. Un parking lo ha eliminado para dibujar otro con la
misma geometría y las mismas etiquetas, la otra la ha eliminado y ha
agregado otra
Hello OSMF Legal Team,
due to a quite troubling revelation by @SomeoneElse that changeset comments are
automatically republished by the third party private company Slack, I would
appreciate if you could share your legal assessment of this situation. More
specifically, what is the copyright
Muchas gracias Omar, espero que se anime a preguntar por aquí por lo que le
pueda estar faltando para realizar mejor su mapeo.
Voy a revisar sus conjuntos de cambios y le comentaré alguno.
Saludos!
El 22 de septiembre de 2020 4:22:17 PM GMT-05:00, Omar Vega Ramos
escribió:
>Hola
>
>El usuario
Hola
El usuario ha respondido [0] sobre algunos nodos de transporte público
eliminados en el conjunto de cambios 91181524 [0] y un colegio en el
conjunto de cambios 91259402 [1], sobre el cual dice que ha cambiado de
lugar, pero no ha agregado el nuevo lugar. Sin embargo tampoco aclara el
porque
I have added a one-line addition to our USBRS wiki suggesting that some aspect
of Lifecycle_prefix (with a link to that wiki) include into USBRS route
proposals something like "proposed:route=bicycle" in addition to
state=proposed, while welcoming further suggestions and refinements. Thanks,
Marcus MERIGHI schrieb am Sa. 19.09.2020 15:29
> ... ob diese unterschiede in den tags sac_scale
> und trail_visibility darstellen (nix=keine unterscheidung)
In OSM ist die Schwierigkeitsbewertung mit sac_scale akzeptiert, aber:
Der Alpenverein Südtirol spricht sich GEGEN eine
Yes, for USBR 201 we essentially followed the ECGW. This made for some
less-than-direct segments, but that was what the locals wanted. But that does
not mean that the route shown on OSM Cycle is proposed USBR 201. Only when you
see the 201 tag on the map will this be the case.
Kerry
Il mar 22 set 2020, 21:16 Andrea Musuruane ha scritto:
> Non va neanche questo. Oltre a non sentire, non riesco neanche a scrivere
> in chat e a togliere il muto. Usare una istanza di jitsi?
>
Firefox sembra avere un problema, puoi usare chrorium/chrome
>
> Ciao,
>
> Andrea
>
Ciao
Luca
>
On Sep 22, 2020, at 12:33 PM, Elliott Plack wrote:
> Great work getting these into the map already Steve! I work on the MDOT bike
> team (as a GIS consultant) so it is great to see this on the map so quickly.
Thank you, Elliott; nice to see your reply! I agree about "so quickly:" I
posted a
Non va neanche questo. Oltre a non sentire, non riesco neanche a scrivere
in chat e a togliere il muto. Usare una istanza di jitsi?
Ciao,
Andrea
Il mar 22 set 2020, 21:13 Matteo Zaffonato ha scritto:
> Cambio di programma, siamo su:
> https://edumeet.imaa.cnr.it/curaosm
>
> Matteo
>
> On Tue,
Cambio di programma, siamo su:
https://edumeet.imaa.cnr.it/curaosm
Matteo
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 10:01 AM Cascafico Giovanni
wrote:
> Per stasera, ore 21:
>
> Meeting Jitsi:
> https://mm.rd.unidata.it/osmgarden
>
> Note condivise e verbale:
> https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/osmgarden
>
>
>
I was just reading through the recent US News & World Report college
rankings and saw my OSM handiwork in their maps locating each school, but
without any attribution. Tiles look to be served from their own domain.
Example: https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/middlebury-college-3691
- Map in
Le 22/09/2020 à 16:38, Jacques Lavignotte a écrit :
> Bonjour,
>
> Je ne trouve pas ou j'ai rêvé ?
Je n'avais pas revé !
Merci Antonin :
https://twitter.com/AdresseDataGouv/status/1301864764205920257
et la totale :
https://adresse.data.gouv.fr/
Merci, Jacques
--
GnuPg : 156520BBC8F5B1E3
Bonjour,
Je ne trouve pas ou j'ai rêvé ?
Un article qui relatait l'intérêt de contacter sa Mairie pour leur
proposer une action collaborative et communale consistant à améliorer la
numérotation de ses rues ?
Aidez-moi à le retouver...
Merci, Jacques
--
GnuPg : 156520BBC8F5B1E3 Because
Poor Law Unions and Electoral Divisions (EDs or DEDs) v Townlands and Civil
Parishes
While the coverage for Townlands and Civil parishes is splendidly almost
nationwide, Sadly the same is not the case for Poor law Unions (PLUs) and
EDs. I have added several dozen PLUs in recent months, mostly up
Ahoj,
Jménem komunity dobrovolníků z Missing Maps Cz Sk vás zvu na mapathon v coworku
Opero na Praze 1, kde budeme mapovat podle satelitních snímků pro Lékaře bez
hranic - Médecins sans Frontières (MSF). Bude za týden v úterý 29.9. od 18:30
do 20:30 s přednáškou o práci v terénu MSF logistika
Comme pour l'instant les références ne ressortent plus du tout dans
Osmose, j'imagine que le jour où on réactivera l'ajout de ref:FR:GeoDAE
dans le signalement Osmose, tous les faux positifs seront à nouveau
visibles. À noter qu'il faudra faire une passe de vérification sur les
références déjà
Le 22/09/2020 à 10:07, PanierAvide - panierav...@riseup.net a écrit :
Dans les mises à jour récentes du flux, on a pu constater que
l'identifiant, documenté comme stable, ne l'était pas : les DAE sont
systématiquement renumérotés. (...)
Pour l'instant le mieux est de les marquer en faux positif
Bonjour,
Au départ, l'analyse Osmose reposait sur deux critères : la distance de
rapprochement (100m) et la présence d'un identifiant "ref:FR:GeoDAE".
Cet identifiant correspondait à la colonne "gid" de la base GéoDAE mis à
disposition à travers le flux WMS du Ministère.
Dans les mises à
Per stasera, ore 21:
Meeting Jitsi:
https://mm.rd.unidata.it/osmgarden
Note condivise e verbale:
https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/osmgarden
Ho creato stamattina i due servizi sopra... spero non ci sia un timeout.
Il 21/09/20, Luca Delucchi ha scritto:
> On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 at 09:50, Cascafico
Bonjour,
Petite question concernant Osmose. Après intégré des DAE, ils figurent
toujours dans les proposition d'intégration dans Osmose.
Un exemple, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5754852748 mais toujours
signalé ici
Hola
Desde hace unos meses atrás el usuario Dayen ha estado ingresando datos
de edificios y barreras en la ciudad de Moyobamba. Sin embargo para este
propósito el usuario ha estado eliminando diferentes objetos ingresados
por otros usuarios. Aquí algunas de la ediciones:
En el conjuntos de
Again, maybe this time the link will show :)
Hello,
Came across this advert, maybe someone will be interested:
GIS Support Officer for Forestry Commission England
https://www.civilservicejobs.service.gov.uk/csr/jobs.cgi?jcode=1687990
This looks like a job between customer services, project
43 matches
Mail list logo
