Re: [Talk-GB] Road refs

2018-09-03 Diskussionsfäden Toby Speight
0> In article <1535573378846-0.p...@n8.nabble.com>, 0> Richard Fairhurst mailto:rich...@systemed.net> ("Richard") wrote: Richard> Toby Speight wrote: >> That's why we have >> rendering rules - if you don't like the rendering, change the rules. Ric

Re: [Talk-GB] GB does not include Northern Ireland

2018-09-03 Diskussionsfäden Toby Speight
>> Even in these days of Brexit, I don't think there's any movement for >> Northern Ireland to leave GB. You've been misinformed! 0> In article , 0> Martin Wynne mailto:mar...@templot.com> ("Martin") wrote: Martin> Northern Ireland is part of the UK but it's not part of GB. But UK is just an

Re: [Talk-GB] Road refs

2018-08-29 Diskussionsfäden Toby Speight
0> In article , 0> Dave F. mailto:davefoxfa...@btinternet.com> ("Dave") wrote: Dave> Point about OSM wiki: IMO giving multiple options for the same Dave> entity leads to confusion & errors so should be avoided. That's exactly what's problematic about "highways_authority_ref": it creates a tag

Re: [Talk-GB] GB does not include Northern Ireland

2018-08-29 Diskussionsfäden Toby Speight
0> In article , 0> Dan S. mailto:danstowell%2b...@gmail.com> ("Dan") wrote: Dan> The documentation happened after-the-fact rather than in advance, Dan> as the AECoC demands. There's still no documentation on the tag wiki at [1] or [2]. Interestingly, there is a mention of "unsigned_ref" [3]

Re: [Talk-GB] GB does not include Northern Ireland

2018-08-29 Diskussionsfäden Toby Speight
0> In article <6591308.YUxS5xHkjF@solus>, 0> WebMaster@Killyfole org uk mailto:webmas...@killyfole.org.uk> ("Wou") wrote: Wou> ... GB doesn't include Northern Ireland, ... Even in these days of Brexit, I don't think there's any movement for Northern Ireland to leave GB. You've been

Re: [Talk-GB] Road refs

2018-08-29 Diskussionsfäden Toby Speight
0> In article <1535456684095-0.p...@n8.nabble.com>, 0> Richard Fairhurst mailto:rich...@systemed.net> ("Richard") wrote: Richard> Toby Speight wrote: >> Who is responsible for coordinating the related changes to software - >> editors, renderers, convert

Re: [Talk-GB] Road refs

2018-08-29 Diskussionsfäden Toby Speight
0> In article , 0> Andrew Hain mailto:andrewhain...@hotmail.co.uk> ("Andrew") wrote: Andrew> Toby, I really think you need to read through the conversation Andrew> archived at Andrew> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2018-August/thread.html Andrew> and answer the points

[Talk-GB] Road refs

2018-08-27 Diskussionsfäden Toby Speight
Recently, all the tertiary roads in my region had their ref tags removed, and replaced with "highways_authority_ref". A week later the unclassified and residential roads suffered similar attack. * Who is supposed to benefit from hiding these data? * Who is responsible for documenting what this