On Wednesday, December 09, 2009, at 03:25PM, "Chris Barham"
wrote:
> BP allows free download of GPS data for their Australian service stations.
Has anyone asked any of the other companies yet? If not, I'll send some emails
about:
http://apps.nowwhere.com.au/caltex/austlocator/search.aspx
http:/
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:42 PM, John Smith wrote:
>
> All 1,381 locations have been uploaded, there was a few more
> duplicates I missed before but these have been removed as well.
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/3340910
>
> Bound to be some duplicates that already exist in the
The long awaited National Public Toilet Map has been released in XML
(but not under CC-BY like many reports recommended) @
http://data.australia.gov.au/610
Instead, it's a click through licence that amongst other Proprietary
terms requires anybody with database access to accept these terms
again (
2009/12/11 Andrew Laughton :
> Sorry for not being more active.
> Yes, Steve is right, my not so obvious point was that any way would
> need to be broken to add extra data.
> Might be that a closed way is not a loop, which is what I thought it was.
> Possibly you could define a closed way for me.
2009/12/10 John Smith :
> 2009/12/11 Steve Bennett :
>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:55 PM, John Smith
>> wrote:
>>> I realise this, but what does that have to do with speed limits?
>>
>> If a road has different speed limits, you'd need to break it up into
>> different ways, in order to be able to
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Emilie Laffray
wrote:
> Also do we need to include tags when there is nothing present. I think the
> basic case is that those services are not present. Including them only when
> they are present would make more sense in my view and would not take as much
> space i
2009/12/10 John Smith
> 2009/12/10 Steve Bennett :
> >>[26] => ATM
> >>
> >
> > You could add a separate (or same?) amenity=atm (or whatever it is)
> point?
>
> I added
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Also if people have better suggestions for tag names I'm happy to
> update the file, just the be
2009/12/10 John Smith
> 2009/12/10 Steve Bennett :
> >>[26] => ATM
> >>
> >
> > You could add a separate (or same?) amenity=atm (or whatever it is)
> point?
>
> I added
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> What about http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:atm%3Dyes for the ATM?
Emilie Laffray
___
2009/12/11 Steve Bennett :
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:55 PM, John Smith
> wrote:
>> I realise this, but what does that have to do with speed limits?
>
> If a road has different speed limits, you'd need to break it up into
> different ways, in order to be able to tag each way correctly.
This to
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:55 PM, John Smith wrote:
> I realise this, but what does that have to do with speed limits?
If a road has different speed limits, you'd need to break it up into
different ways, in order to be able to tag each way correctly.
Steve
__
2009/12/10 Steve Bennett :
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:46 PM, John Smith
> wrote:
>>
>> Or did I miss your point/question?
>>
>
> I think the point was, the record was for the largest single unbroken way,
> which can only really be achieved by crappy data - relatively few points,
> relatively lit
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:46 PM, John Smith wrote:
> Or did I miss your point/question?
>
>
I think the point was, the record was for the largest single unbroken way,
which can only really be achieved by crappy data - relatively few points,
relatively little information. So we're unlikely to brea
2009/12/10 Andrew Laughton :
> 2009/12/10 John Smith :
>> 2009/12/10 Andrew Laughton :
>>> Part of the trouble is, it all needs to have the same speed limit, the
>>> same road surface, the same name, the same width etc.
>>
>> U huh?
>>
>
> Every time something changes, the way needs to be split
All 1,381 locations have been uploaded, there was a few more
duplicates I missed before but these have been removed as well.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/3340910
Bound to be some duplicates that already exist in the system, but most
will need to be moved in any case because the g
2009/12/10 John Smith :
> 2009/12/10 Andrew Laughton :
>> Part of the trouble is, it all needs to have the same speed limit, the
>> same road surface, the same name, the same width etc.
>
> U huh?
>
Every time something changes, the way needs to be split, or am I
making a bad assumption ?
___
2009/12/10 Andrew Laughton :
> Part of the trouble is, it all needs to have the same speed limit, the
> same road surface, the same name, the same width etc.
U huh?
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/li
2009/12/10 John Smith :
> 2009/12/10 James Livingston :
>> The problem is that a lot of our big stuff is broken up into multiple ways
>> due to being too accurate and so having >2000 nodes. The largest thing I can
>> think of with not too complicated edges is the Woomera Prohibited Area,
>> some
All are welcome:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brisbane/Mapping_Parties/2009-12
- David
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Brisbane-Mapping-Meetup-next-Wednesday-Evening-tp26725699p26725699.html
Sent from the OpenStreetMap - Australian Talk mailing list archive at
Nabb
2009/12/10 James Livingston :
> The problem is that a lot of our big stuff is broken up into multiple ways
> due to being too accurate and so having >2000 nodes. The largest thing I can
> think of with not too complicated edges is the Woomera Prohibited Area,
> somewhere around 13km iirc. I
On 10/12/2009, at 6:57 PM, Liz wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Dec 2009, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>> ... the excellent Philippines mapping team who managed to create one
>> single closed way enclosing an area of roughly 300 thousand square
>> kilometres!
>>
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?way=32126765
>>
>> The
OK - my plan for our Sturt Highway, virtual mapping party is to concentrate
on Renmark.
Only a small part of it has been surveyed and so, on the way over, I'll stay
overnight and see how much I can get done.
Then on the way back to Canberra I'll go back that way again and do a bit
more and also ho
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> ... the excellent Philippines mapping team who managed to create one
> single closed way enclosing an area of roughly 300 thousand square
> kilometres!
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?way=32126765
>
> The runner-up is a place in Sarah Palin Land,
>
> ht
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009, Steve Bennett wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:39 PM, John Smith
wrote:
> > The 2 BP's along the Bruce Highway north of Brisbane aren't located
> > properly either, it looks like they've simply used address to geo
> > lookups and when the addresses are specific they co-ords
23 matches
Mail list logo
