This is another one of those cases where the instructions used to be
in unclear. For a while the Wiki said the count was number of lanes
in each direction. Some did that, some did total lane count. It
has since been changed to the current (and I'm told former) total
count, but there is quite
Mark,
The number refers to the total number of lanes of the way. Refer to
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes for more information.
They should be tagged with lanes=2 although AFAIK it is meaningless not
required if it is a bi-directional road (as per the second example on the
web page
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010, Mark Pulley wrote:
What do other people do?
ignore lanes in country towns and cities
i've plenty of other things i find useful to map
next comment is that the lanes=1 on the wiki means one lane each way and so a
one lane bridge needs to be lanes=1/2
a two lane road with a
My thoughts are the same as Liz.
The number of lanes should be the number available for each direction.
If the road has a lanes= tag and a oneway=yes tag, then it should be the
total number for the way.
David
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 18:07 +1000, Stephen Hope wrote:
This is another one of those
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:49:39 +0800, Arie Paap wildmy...@gmail.com wrote:
The correct coastline data seems to be in use again. Tiles that still
have blue background are updated when resubmitted for rendering. Would
be nice to be able to determine what date the rendered coastline comes
from.
2010/1/22 David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au
Just stumbled across this nifty little device..
http://gizmodo.com/5442073/sonys-gps+-and-compass
+enabled-camera-knows-where-you-photographhttp://gizmodo.com/5442073/sonys-gps+-and-compass%0A+enabled-camera-knows-where-you-photograph
For US$400
2010/1/22 David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au:
For US$400 you get a full HD resolution camera, which can geotag your
photos with both GPS coordinates and compass direction.
Ummm $400 isn't that much money, when I was into photography you
didn't get much for $400, a small/cheap lens maybe...
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Gregory and...@scss.com.au
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 2:12 PM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Blue?
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:49:39 +0800, Arie Paap wildmy...@gmail.com wrote:
The correct coastline data seems to be in use
Most if not all services should now be restored.
Also in the mean time Franc was kind enough to upload suburb
boundaries, so these can be reviewed and/or fixed by using the osm
files:
http://map-data.bigtincan.com/data/suburbs/
___
Talk-au mailing
Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
another example of let's change the wiki and radically change meaning
missed
by me because i don't find the wiki useful
That page is still useless.
The second photo shows cars parked on both sides of the street facing
away from the camera, which suggests it's a
2010/1/23 Sam Couter s...@couter.id.au:
There's no indication of how to map asymmetrical roads, Liz's suggestion
of using 1/2 or 3/2 amuses me.
The most common example I can think of is over taking sections on say
the Pacific or New England or Bruce or highways where it isn't
dual carriage
Sam Couter wrote:
There's no indication of how to map asymmetrical roads, Liz's suggestion
of using 1/2 or 3/2 amuses me.
As a separate issue, how to map roads with differing numbers of lanes,
perhaps based on time? Pacific Highway at Turramurra is an example, I
think the Spit Bridge in
2010/1/23 Sam Couter s...@couter.id.au:
The second photo shows cars parked on both sides of the street facing
away from the camera, which suggests it's a one-way street. It's a poor
example.
You can't necessarily assume that a street is one way based on the
direction the cars are parked. In
2010/1/23 Kevin Pye kevin@gmail.com:
2010/1/23 Sam Couter s...@couter.id.au:
The second photo shows cars parked on both sides of the street facing
away from the camera, which suggests it's a one-way street. It's a poor
example.
You can't necessarily assume that a street is one way based
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010, Kevin Pye wrote:
The second photo shows cars parked on both sides of the street facing
away from the camera, which suggests it's a one-way street. It's a poor
example.
You can't necessarily assume that a street is one way based on the
direction the cars are parked.
15 matches
Mail list logo
