On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, John Smith wrote:
On 11 March 2010 05:40, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
http://billiau.net/zoph/photo.php?photo_id=5505
Thanks for saving me the trip, so on their signs it looks like 'st.george'
I wouldn't promise that I have tagged that branch correctly
--
English
Have been anticipating this for a few weeks and finally it has arrived.
Nearmap imagery now covers a fair portion of Northern Victoria.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On a recent trip, I twice came across roads marked No Road. Anyone
know what this means? I rode down both of them, and was rewarded by
really interesting, very rough tracks that fortunately did connect up
with the road network again. Are they former roads, no longer publicly
maintained? How would
Hi,
I use to tag traffic signals at the intersect of the roads, however
with NearMap I can see that for complex intersections this does not
work as well as I would like, three things I can see to do are:-
1. tag at the intersecttion of roads
2. tag at the location of the signals
3. either (1) or
Personally, since NearMap became available, i've been placing traffic light
tags at every thick white stop line at the intersection, which means for a
standard intersection, there are 4 traffic light nodes.
On 11/03/2010, at 11:50 PM, Franc Carter wrote:
Hi,
I use to tag traffic signals at
On 11/03/10 23:55, Luke Woolley wrote:
Personally, since NearMap became available, i've been placing traffic light
tags at every thick white stop line at the intersection, which means for a
standard intersection, there are 4 traffic light nodes.
This is exactly what I've been doing too,
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Luke Woolley lswool...@gmail.com wrote:
Personally, since NearMap became available, i've been placing traffic light
tags at every thick white stop line at the intersection, which means for a
standard intersection, there are 4 traffic light nodes.
What's the
On 12/03/10 08:39, Steve Bennett wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Luke Woolleylswool...@gmail.com wrote:
Personally, since NearMap became available, i've been placing traffic light
tags at every thick white stop line at the intersection, which means for a
standard intersection,
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 23:50 +1100, Franc Carter wrote:
Hi,
I use to tag traffic signals at the intersect of the roads, however
with NearMap I can see that for complex intersections this does not
work as well as I would like, three things I can see to do are:-
1. tag at the intersecttion
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:09 AM, John Henderson snow...@gmx.com wrote:
The benefit is in greater accuracy and completeness. If we can do
better than commercial street directories, then why not?
At the cost of managing that extra information. So far, I haven't seen
much evidence that we have
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 09:52 +1100, Steve Bennett wrote:
Put it this way: how would you render a single circle for any
intersection that has a traffic light? That is, if there are traffic
light nodes at one intersection, you still only want to render one
circle. It's a pretty obvious use case.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:43 AM, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
From a routing perspective, its more useful to have the information on
the road intersection. While it might render nicer if you put objects
geographically where they are (separated from the road), from a routing
On 12/03/10 09:52, Steve Bennett wrote:
At the cost of managing that extra information. So far, I haven't seen
much evidence that we have ways of aggregating excess information into
more manageable chunks.
Put it this way: how would you render a single circle for any
intersection that has a
Hi all,
I notice that we have some national park boundaries, but not all.
Anyone know where they come from? Are there any usable sources of
data? I can't see that attempting to find the boundaries by
driving/walking around the park would be very fruitful.
Steve
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:21 AM, John Henderson snow...@gmx.com wrote:
Other than de-cluttering (which tends to be done automatically anyway)
I'm not sure why you'd want to render only one set of lights if there
were more than that.
Well, because to most people a set of lights covers a whole
Yeah, it's been available for a couple of weeks now - plenty of work
for us to do. Pity there's such a large gap between Bendigo and
Geelong - that's one of my favourite areas of Victoria.
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Craig Feuerherdt
craigfeuerhe...@gmail.com wrote:
Have been anticipating
try http://www.protectedplanet.net/
as a place to start...
jim
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I notice that we have some national park boundaries, but not all.
Anyone know where they come from? Are there any usable sources of
data? I can't
I created a stub wiki entry on this topic.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Invalid_Abbreviation_Expansion
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
... So far, I haven't seen
much evidence that we have ways of aggregating excess information into
more manageable chunks.
As others have already suggested: we need relations.
There's already proposals semi-underway
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Jim Croft jim.cr...@gmail.com wrote:
try http://www.protectedplanet.net/
as a place to start...
I couldn't find any statement about licensing there. To clarify, my
question is not how do I find NP boundaries - that's easy, there are
maps on parkweb.vic.gov.au
National and state park boundaries for Victoria (from the Department
of Sustainability and Environment's Vicmap Lite package) were released
under a CC - Attribution 2.5 Australia licence earlier this year. You
can download the polygon data as a KMZ file here:
21 matches
Mail list logo
