On 9 April 2010 13:21, Mark marku...@bigpond.com wrote:
Some how I caused a problem when uploading a national park with an admin
Boundary when viewed in JOSM.
Can you give us the way/relation ID number or at least the changeset,
I can't find any national parks in the area you specified.
One of the affected relations is 191568.
In JOSM it appears blue in colour.
I have temp removed the national park.
Regards,
Markus
-Original Message-
From: John Smith [mailto:deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, 9 April 2010 4:19 PM
To: Mark
Cc: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
And this way by the look of it.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/191568
Can you send the national park as an osm file?
Cheers
Ross
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 16:49:16 +0930
Markus marku...@bigpond.com wrote:
One of the affected relations is 191568.
In JOSM it appears blue in colour.
I
On 9 April 2010 17:19, Markus marku...@bigpond.com wrote:
One of the affected relations is 191568.
I was the last person to change that relation:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/191568
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
If the area near way 38666509 is downloaded into JOSM you should be able see
what I mean.
Markus
-Original Message-
From: John Smith [mailto:deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, 9 April 2010 5:16 PM
To: Markus
Cc: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Admin Boundary
Hi All,
I'm back did you miss me? (probably did not even notice I wasn't here).
Anyway a question in regards to relations.
I've notice some highways getting changed to relations for the name and ref
number. Now some are having the relation=collection collection=street whereas
most are
On 9 April 2010 17:59, Markus marku...@bigpond.com wrote:
If the area near way 38666509 is downloaded into JOSM you should be able see
what I mean.
You should have used a relation instead of tagging individual ways,
natural=water has to be a closed way or a closed multipolygon.
On 9 April 2010 18:35, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
Anyway a question in regards to relations.
I've notice some highways getting changed to relations for the name and ref
number. Now some are having the relation=collection collection=street
whereas most are relation=route
The lake isn't one of my edits. To fix I assume I would create a relation of
all the lake ways.
Markus.
-Original Message-
From: John Smith [mailto:deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, 9 April 2010 5:45 PM
To: Markus
Cc: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Admin
On 9 April 2010 18:30, Markus marku...@bigpond.com wrote:
The lake isn't one of my edits. To fix I assume I would create a relation of
all the lake ways.
Since it wasn't your edit I just fixed it.
Although I couldn't find your national park attached.
Thanks for fixing it.
Regards,
Markus
-Original Message-
From: John Smith [mailto:deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, 9 April 2010 5:45 PM
To: Markus
Cc: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Admin Boundary Problem
On 9 April 2010 17:59, Markus marku...@bigpond.com
From what I've seen collections don't seem consistent.
The couple I've just been looking at are far from complete and probably should
be route=road anyway.
I'd rather not comment on which is better since I'd give a bias answer
about route relations due to me spending so much time adding
I don't control the software generating the GPS data. I use the
downloads from OSM Australia.
It's not just the navigation. The display doesn't show the correct
names either.
John Smith wrote:
On 8 April 2010 22:13, Richard Colless fire...@ar.com.au wrote:
I was using my GPS to
No, it's called the M5 motorway from where it starts near the airport
right through to a point a few kilometres SW of Liverpool. There are
signs saying "M5 motorway" right along this section, and at the end of
the motorway there is a sign that says "Thank you for travelling on the
M5". At that
On 9 April 2010 22:14, Richard Colless fire...@ar.com.au wrote:
I don't control the software generating the GPS data. I use the downloads
from OSM Australia.
Regardless, there is software involved in preparing the information
from OSM to Garmin format.
It's not just the navigation. The
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 22:24 +1000, Richard Colless wrote:
No, it's called the M5 motorway from where it starts near the airport
right through to a point a few kilometres SW of Liverpool. There are
signs saying M5 motorway right along this section, and at the end of
the motorway there is a sign
On 10 April 2010 09:06, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
So, in other words.. yes, in some parts of the United States, freeway is
implied to mean no toll, whereas in most of the US (and the rest of the
world), freeway means the traffic flows free from restrictions,
regardless of
On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 09:12 +1000, John Smith wrote:
On 10 April 2010 09:06, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
So, in other words.. yes, in some parts of the United States, freeway is
implied to mean no toll, whereas in most of the US (and the rest of the
world), freeway means the
On 10 April 2010 09:22, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
As you might have noticed, in brackets there was a phrase 'and the rest
of the world', meaning 'not in the US'. Can you point to any definition
that freeway implies toll-free? The wiki page I referrenced seems to
disagree.
I
19 matches
Mail list logo
