-- Forwarded message --
From: Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz
Date: 6 April 2011 19:08
Subject: [OSM-dev] To OSM editor authors ...
To: d...@openstreetmap.org
... the License Working Group intends implementing Phase 3 of the
license change implementation plan [1]. This involves
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011 19:31:53 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com didn't write: (Michael Collinson
did)
For clarity:
- This will only affect (77,000) contributors who registered before
May 2010 and who have not accepted the new terms as part of the
voluntary re-licensing program.
On 6 April 2011 10:51, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011 19:31:53 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com didn't write: (Michael Collinson
did)
For clarity:
- This will only affect (77,000) contributors who registered before
May 2010 and who have not accepted
On 06/04/11 19:31, John Smith wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz
Date: 6 April 2011 19:08
Subject: [OSM-dev] To OSM editor authors ...
To: d...@openstreetmap.org
... the License Working Group intends implementing Phase 3 of the
license
I was very keen and learning ...had done a few edits not many but I was
planning on getting right into it.
I don't agree with the new licensing and have just been sitting on the side
reading.
I have some firm views against the new licensing and also about the methods
that
have
So is Phase 4 the end for those that don't agree? What happens to the
data if we don't agree? and the data built on top of that data?
I have read what I could about the new Contributor Terms and I get the
drift about the CC-BY-SA and ODbL. Just not sure about the OSMF bit.
Regards,
Michael
On 06/04/2011, at 7:31 PM, John Smith wrote:
... the License Working Group intends implementing Phase 3 of the
license change implementation plan [1]. This involves blocking edits
with HTTP Forbidden messages until the individual contributor has
Accepted/Declined the new terms by logging in
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 8:50 AM, James Livingston li...@sunsetutopia.com wrote:
Time to go read the CTs again...
Hi James,
That's one of the sections of v1 that has been clarified in v1.2.4.
Have a look.
http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Contributor_Terms
There are around 12,000 accounts which have prior to May 2010
contributed 95%+ of all the data.
So how many of these 12,000 accounts have agreed to the new CT's?
Cheers
Ross
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
There are around 12,000 accounts which have prior to May 2010
contributed 95%+ of all the data.
Regards
Grant
Also how many of these are actual people not import accounts eg ABS2006?
Cheers
Ross
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:52 AM, 4x4falcon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
There are around 12,000 accounts which have prior to May 2010
contributed 95%+ of all the data.
Regards
Grant
Also how many of these are actual people not import accounts eg ABS2006?
I don't know, I haven't tried to
Paul,
I know how you feel. I came home from a trip to remote Australia with lots of
material to upload and was met with the “traffic” generated by this issue. I
don’t understand what’s it’s all about. The Wicki, like it is in most things,
is confused and inconclusive. No one has contacted
This came through over night.
Is it a standard mailer going out to all?
Original Message
Subject:[OpenStreetMap] OpenStreetMap is changing the licence
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 16:09:39 +0100
From: wicking m-177534-5c8...@messages.openstreetmap.org
To:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 22:09 +1000, Michael Hampson wrote:
So is Phase 4 the end for those that don't agree? What happens to the
data if we don't agree? and the data built on top of that data?
Well, it depends what you read. According to the wiki, stage 4 is when
OSM asks the community what
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 09:17 +1000, Michael Hampson wrote:
This came through over night.
Is it a standard mailer going out to all?
I received the same, so presumably yes.
One has to wonder how many innocent users who dont want to be banished
from the project, simply click 'agree' or follow
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:37 AM, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 22:09 +1000, Michael Hampson wrote:
So is Phase 4 the end for those that don't agree? What happens to the
data if we don't agree? and the data built on top of that data?
Well, it depends what you
On 7 April 2011 09:37, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
In UK:
- This will remove 65% of users
- This will remove 40% of nodes, 40% of ways and 10% of relations
In Europe:
- This will remove 61% of users
- This will remove 20% of nodes, 20% of ways and 15% of relations
I wonder
On 7 April 2011 10:06, Alex (Maxious) Sadleir maxi...@gmail.com wrote:
What happened to NearMap?
Nearmap have refused to allow data derived from their imagery to be
used without guarantee of attribution and share-a-like in a future
license, or having a guarantee that such data would be removed
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:14 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 April 2011 10:06, Alex (Maxious) Sadleir maxi...@gmail.com wrote:
What happened to NearMap?
Nearmap have refused to allow data derived from their imagery to be
used without guarantee of attribution and
On 7 April 2011 10:31, Alex (Maxious) Sadleir maxi...@gmail.com wrote:
Surely that's a simple procedural matter then (CT 1.2.4 already has
It always has been, but as others have pointed out, control of the
process has gone on largely without proper consultation and feedback
to better shape what
On 7 April 2011 09:42, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 09:17 +1000, Michael Hampson wrote:
This came through over night.
Is it a standard mailer going out to all?
I received the same, so presumably yes.
More importantly is it a official OSMF or
On 6 April 2011 21:47, All Blokes speed_13...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
I was very keen and learning ...had done a few edits not many but I
was planning on getting right into it.
I don't agree with the new licensing and have just been sitting on the side
reading.
Just out of interest, I'd
More importantly is it a official OSMF or semi-official LWG email, or just
some pro-ODbL people spamming everyone?
Pretty sure it's the last one. I received it a few weeks back, even through
i'd put a note on my OSM user page saying i didn't want it.
I'm sure i've seen something on the OSM
Supposedly it sends you to this flippant page if you decline the CT:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributor_Terms_Declined
I think the lolcat picture on that page tells us exactly what they think of
those of us that won't / can 't / don't want to accept their terms.
Certainly
On 7 April 2011 00:37, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 22:09 +1000, Michael Hampson wrote:
So is Phase 4 the end for those that don't agree? What happens to the
data if we don't agree? and the data built on top of that data?
Well, it depends what you read.
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 03:19 +0100, Grant Slater wrote:
For clarity: (according to odbl.de)
In Australia:
For pete's sake! Stop making up blatantly untrue stuff.
Those are likely the precentages if we moved *today* without even
formally contacting/emailing anyone.
I never made
On 7 April 2011 12:57, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
If the Australian issue is so important, as others have suggested why
isnt OSMF seeking to make a rapid agreement with NearMap as was done
with Bing?
This really needs to be done.
Is wonder if this is just due to a shortage of
27 matches
Mail list logo
