On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 21:22 +1000, Nick Hocking wrote:
Unfortunately this has meant that Canberra OSM data is now badly out
of date. I have recently heard of a situation where up-to-date
Canberra data could have been *extremely* usefull to somebody.
Just out of interest, I noticed youve been
-- Forwarded message --
From: Alister Hood alister.h...@synergine.com
Date: 5 May 2011 11:58
Subject: [Aust-NZ] LINZ survey
To: OSGeo NZ/AU aust...@lists.osgeo.org, nzopen...@googlegroups.com
Hi everyone,
First, apologies if you get this twice because you’re on both lists.
I
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 12:19 +1000, John Smith wrote:
On 6 May 2011 10:47, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
You mentioned previously that Bing was out of alinement by up to 100m,
if this is the case it is a clear case of vandalism since he should be
at the vest least realigning Bing
On 6 May 2011 10:47, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
I remember hearing once about someone writing some sort of plugin or
database which kept a track of how offset parts of the bing imagery are,
but never heard if it was successful or how extensive the coverage is.
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 14:02 +1000, Ian Sergeant wrote:
On 6 May 2011 10:47, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
Given its age (over 10 years old in Canberra), and these nasty accuracy
limitations anyone would be crazy to use it in preference to NearMap.
Was surveying around Casey on
5 matches
Mail list logo
