On 01/12/11 19:15, Andrew Harvey wrote:
Deleted by user: cc_cleaner in changeset
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/9915617
I found this by looking at this area in the owl viewer:
http://matt.dev.openstreetmap.org/owl_viewer/map
Thanks Andrew. I wasn't aware of that facility. It
On 01/12/2011, at 6:15 PM, Andrew Harvey wrote:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:58 PM, John Henderson snow...@gmx.com wrote:
Lake Cargelligo township shows mapped streets at this zoom level:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-33.3081lon=146.3792zoom=12layers=M
but disappears as you zoom in from
On 01/12/11 22:34, Mark Pulley wrote:
User cc-cleaner? I've had a quick look at some of the changesets, and
they all seem to be just deleting things. I have a suspicion that the
things being deleted are by users who haven't agreed to the new license,
but I didn't think we were up to this stage
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 8:48 AM, John Henderson snow...@gmx.com wrote:
I saw the same relationship with Firefishy (from South Africa) and went to
bed puzzling about the coincidence. Firefishy was adding in a little data
within minutes of cc-cleaner's massive deletes.
I woke up a couple of
On 1 December 2011 13:48, John Henderson snow...@gmx.com wrote:
On 01/12/11 22:34, Mark Pulley wrote:
User cc-cleaner? I've had a quick look at some of the changesets, and
they all seem to be just deleting things. I have a suspicion that the
things being deleted are by users who haven't
On 02/12/11 01:11, Grant Slater wrote:
I have nothing to do with the cc_cleaner user's deletes/edits. I often
watch OSM edits using http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/LiveMapViewer
and noticed the deletes of mostly DrLizAU's contributions. I suspected
DrLizAU was removing her own contributions,
On 02/12/11 01:11, Grant Slater wrote:
I often watch OSM edits using
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/LiveMapViewer and noticed the
deletes of mostly DrLizAU's contributions. I suspected DrLizAU was
removing her own contributions, but cannot back this up.
DrLizAU's ethical standards are
I've been thinking for a while about the best way to remove CC-BY-SA-only data
when the time comes. As already noted, some people have started already by
deleting large areas of data and re-adding from bing (losing all the tags) -
which at best may be unnecessary, and at present (as no date has
On 02/12/11 09:00, Richard Weait wrote:
Deleting tainted data and remapping by local mappers is far superior
to waiting until March 31 and running a script.
So removing data from decliners and remapping it, and reaching out
to those who haven't yet responded is valid and valuable.
Thanks for
On 2 December 2011 07:20, John Henderson snow...@gmx.com wrote:
On 02/12/11 09:00, Richard Weait wrote:
Deleting tainted data and remapping by local mappers is far superior
to waiting until March 31 and running a script.
So removing data from decliners and remapping it, and reaching out
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:09 PM, El Segundo Can't win
el_segundo_cant_...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
Late to the conversation but..
First up, from people have said, what cc-cleaner is doing is shocking
vandalism, whether they intend it or not.
I'm disappointed by deletions without remapping. One
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Nick Hocking nick.hock...@gmail.com wrote:
Richard,
I don't believe that it is possible to start remapping in Australia until
the maxspeed bots are removed (from the database and also all histories)
without affecting any other edits to those ways.
Or
Richard wroteHi Nick,
I see several approaches available here:
- ask the bot owner to accept
- revert the bot work
- ask for help reverting (typically others in the community or DWG)
- argue convincingly on legal talk that the maxspeed bot and bots in
general don't have rights to decline
Hi.
In general I think the maxspeed edits were very useful, in terms of how
they help routing. I wouldn't want to lose them.
AFAIK the edits were not made by a bot login though.
The content of these edits is in the public domain (I.e. the default
residential speed limit in Australia) and these
Ben wrote
The content of these edits is in the public domain (I.e. the default
residential speed limit in Australia) and these edits could be re-edited
by an actual bot. Given that these edits are easy to identify, and the
large number of ways, this might be a useful exercise. It would give us a
It would be my guess that Australia has the highest non-CT compliant data to
active mapper ratio in the world, even if we ignore the ABS2006 import. I also
reckon it's likely that there's a lot of people in other countries that would
be willing to help out.
I would also guess that most
There are already systems written specifically for OSM to do this
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Tasking_Manager
https://github.com/tlpinney/osmtask/
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
17 matches
Mail list logo
