Re: [talk-au] Marrickville Cycle Routes (Was: Re: Redaction recovery)

2012-07-31 Thread Ian Sergeant
On 31 July 2012 11:49, Sam Russell g.samuelruss...@gmail.com wrote: Where route numbers are in repair or in repair but separated by clear intervening route signs, keep the route ref and name. Where route numbers are in disrepair copy key:ref=L# to key:old_ref=L#? My Saturday ride is

Re: [talk-au] Cycle Routes Bicycle advisory road markings (Was: Marrickville Cycle Routes (Was: Re: Redaction recovery))

2012-07-31 Thread Sam Russell
Dear Ian, In contrast to: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2319564 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2319563 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2319565 which are continuously marked with the blue route marker, my previous experience of L8/L13 in

Re: [talk-au] Cycle Routes Bicycle advisory road markings (Was: Marrickville Cycle Routes (Was: Re: Redaction recovery))

2012-07-31 Thread Ben Kelley
When there is only a bike logo painted on the road I generally just use lcn=yes (or apply an equivalent relation). Contrary to the Wikipedia article, you can always use the whole lane regardless of the marking. (Except when there is a bw bike lane sign.) I don't think these road markings warrant

Re: [talk-au] Cycle Routes Bicycle advisory road markings (Was: Marrickville Cycle Routes (Was: Re: Redaction recovery))

2012-07-31 Thread Ian Sergeant
On 1 August 2012 11:37, Sam Russell g.samuelruss...@gmail.com wrote: As another bicycle related question, could other mappers opine on bicycle advisory road markings, in particular could we discuss the following points: Bicycle advisory road markings in the centres of lanes (