Hello Li
what happens when a track is tagged with 4wd_only=yes and grade=6?
Technically I'd see no issue having both those key combos present. In
practice not good in that one must be wrong but that won't upset OSM.
In the mainstream maps, the way should be rendered according to grade6.
The
Hi David,
Here is an example of why the grading combined with 4WD_only tags may not work
in conjunction in rendering. let's say all 4WD tracks are rendered using dotted
lines (very common on raster maps and widely adopted). What happens when it
already 4wd_only=yes but it's also tagged as
Hi Li, I still don't see a problem.
Firstly, I am not aware of any publicly visible map that uses the
4wd_Only tag. Maybe I am wrong, can you point me to one ?
But even if there is, and it renderes as you say, then its still OK
really. We'd see a dotted line and 4wd Recommended appended to the
So, Ian Sergeant has presented reasoning why we should not pursue more
complicated schemes for applying traffic lights to intersections of dual
carriageways - fair enough.
This brings me back to the incident that triggered me to start this thread:
there are several intersections of dual
Hi all,
I have an angle for updating OSM. I want to find a file of all scenic
drives. The ones sign posted with brown signs that you see when driving.
For all my Googling, I can't seem to find a map or a file of these. It
would be good to tag all such roads in OSM so it's easy to plan scenic
On 07/11/12 23:21, Steer wrote:
So, Ian Sergeant has presented reasoning why we should not pursue more
complicated schemes for applying traffic lights to intersections of
dual carriageways -- fair enough.
That is not quite what I said.
I'd be happy to see a more detailed schema that is
Yep, good idea Wil. I don't see anything obvious in Map Features,
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features you really have two
choices, define your own or start a campaign to define a suitable key.
First is easier, second will do a heap better job as if most people do
it the same way, its
Traditionally, I've seen these mapped as route relations
type=route
route=road
network=T
ref=number
Where they are numbered tourist routes. There are a fair few of them
around, and this is documented on AU tagging guidelines page, I think..
Ian.
On 8 November 2012 08:47, David Bannon
Agreed. What Ian says. Use a route relation.
- Ben.
On Nov 8, 2012 9:18 AM, Ian Sergeant inas66+...@gmail.com wrote:
Traditionally, I've seen these mapped as route relations
type=route
route=road
network=T
ref=number
Where they are numbered tourist routes. There are a fair few of
Ian, I don't think it (route relations for eg scenic routes) is doc'ed
on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines
Or not that I can find. Sounds like a good approach, should it be on the
above page so people can be suitably inspired ?
David
On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 09:17
I guess for copyright reasons you would actually need to go and read
the street signs instead of tagging out of a copyrighted book or file?
Russell
On 2012-11-08 00:02, wil ly wrote:
Hi all,
I have an angle for updating OSM. I want to find a file of all scenic
drives. The ones sign posted
On 8 November 2012 11:06, David Bannon dban...@internode.on.net wrote:
Ian, I don't think it (route relations for eg scenic routes) is doc'ed
on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines
Or not that I can find. Sounds like a good approach, should it be on the
above
Hi guys,
I have discovered, finally, a couple of resources for tourist drives (as
indicated by numbered brown signs).
1. DERM's physical roads dataset dated 28/9/2010 has a TOURNUM field, but
this only seems to contain a few tourist drives: 1, 5, 8, 9, 10, 16, 22,
23, 42, 43, 99, LA and z (the
13 matches
Mail list logo
