Re: [talk-au] Large number of Tasmanian boundaries removed

2017-04-26 Thread Simon Poole
NP then. Simon Am 26.04.2017 um 13:55 schrieb Andrew Davidson: > Yeap, it was a undiscussed import from a dataset we don't have > permission to use in OSM. Don't be surprised if you see a large number > of LGA boundaries disappear in Queensland as well (same > story...private import from

Re: [talk-au] Large number of Tasmanian boundaries removed

2017-04-26 Thread Andrew Davidson
Yeap, it was a undiscussed import from a dataset we don't have permission to use in OSM. Don't be surprised if you see a large number of LGA boundaries disappear in Queensland as well (same story...private import from dataset we can't use). On 26/04/17 21:36, Simon Poole wrote: Not sure if

[talk-au] Large number of Tasmanian boundaries removed

2017-04-26 Thread Simon Poole
Not sure if anybody from the AUS community actually follows https://wambachers-osm.website/index.php/10-osm-reports/876-countries-compare-2017-04-26 , but a large number of boundaries in Tasmania were deleted yesterday, for example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6269038/history I didn't

Re: [talk-au] Roadside rest areas tagged as camp sites

2017-04-26 Thread Warin
We'll get there. Crossed posts. No rush. highway=rest_area rest_area:camping=caravan ? My previous post had :conditional ... and that is wrong. I don't know about applying camp_site tags to rest areas, maybe. Will think on it. On 26-Apr-17 05:29 PM, David Bannon wrote: Hmm, at risk of

Re: [talk-au] Roadside rest areas tagged as camp sites

2017-04-26 Thread Warin
On 26-Apr-17 05:17 PM, David Bannon wrote: On 25/04/17 20:33, Warin wrote: Take the respective 'tourism=camp_site' data to 'highway=rest_area' with 'caravan=yes'. Just what will that mean then ? That a caravan can pull into the rest area ? We will loose the information that camping is, at

Re: [talk-au] Roadside rest areas tagged as camp sites

2017-04-26 Thread David Bannon
Hmm, at risk of answering my own question, there is a key, camp_site=* that is intended to apply to tourism=camp_site. Could you apply it to a rest area as well ? highway=rest_area camp_site=basic caravan=yes tent=no David On 26/04/17 17:17, David Bannon wrote: On 25/04/17 20:33, Warin

Re: [talk-au] Roadside rest areas tagged as camp sites

2017-04-26 Thread David Bannon
On 25/04/17 20:33, Warin wrote: Take the respective 'tourism=camp_site' data to 'highway=rest_area' with 'caravan=yes'. Just what will that mean then ? That a caravan can pull into the rest area ? We will loose the information that camping is, at least primafacie allowed/practical ? I