I'll look there. Thanks.
On Sun, Oct 7, 2018, at 12:31 PM, Warin wrote:
> On 07/10/18 11:22, cleary wrote:
> >
> > In regard to admin boundaries sharing the coastline, I think that would
> > also be incorrect but I am less confident of my view on this.
> >
> > I did update some administrative
PS While on coast lines ... computer model of the Kimberly coastline
over a few thousand years.. looks like it is breathing.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-10-07/wa-coastline-transformed-by-sea-levels-over-thousands-of-years/10338500
On 07/10/18 11:22, cleary wrote:
In regard to admin
On 07/10/18 11:22, cleary wrote:
In regard to admin boundaries sharing the coastline, I think that would also be
incorrect but I am less confident of my view on this.
I did update some administrative boundaries in South Australia using the SA
Government Data and those boundaries did not
In regard to admin boundaries sharing the coastline, I think that would also be
incorrect but I am less confident of my view on this.
I did update some administrative boundaries in South Australia using the SA
Government Data and those boundaries did not coincide with the coastline (see
the
On 06/10/18 21:34, Andrew Harvey wrote:
Thanks for raising that. I'd seen some boundaries in WA defined in
legislation as, follow this road, then that road etc. but I think that
was for school zones. So the LGA and Suburb/Localities are defined by
the cadastral plans then?
I hear the points and
Thanks for raising that. I'd seen some boundaries in WA defined in
legislation as, follow this road, then that road etc. but I think that
was for school zones. So the LGA and Suburb/Localities are defined by
the cadastral plans then?
I hear the points and see there is consensus to not reuse
On 06/10/18 20:52, cleary wrote:
In regard to administrative boundaries being attached to other features such as
waterways and roads, I think it is a trade-off between accuracy and convenience.
+1.
If the admin boundaries use other features as there boundaries then it is the
other feature
In regard to administrative boundaries being attached to other features such as
waterways and roads, I think it is a trade-off between accuracy and
convenience.
I am most familiar with NSW. Boundaries are not "defined" by words but rather
by surveyors' charts. The surveyors may often have
>Do you have examples of the overlapping ways? It looks pretty okay
around Brisbane to me. Here's an a mesh of the LGA's in GeoJSON which
you can import into JOSM with enough memory.
https://tianjara.net/data/LGA_mesh.geojson.xz
Just import the shapefile into JOSM and use the validation. The
On Sat, 6 Oct 2018 at 15:57, Joel H. wrote:
>
> OK everyone I am currently editing the LGA shapefiles for QLD so no one
> should attempt as to not create conflicts (although I'm not currently working
> on the suburbs file).
Don't worry, no one should actually be doing any importing until we
On Fri, 5 Oct 2018 at 11:43, cleary wrote:
> A month ago, we celebrated the news that OSM now has approval to use the PSMA
> Administrative Boundaries and there was some discussion, including the need
> for a proper import process. I am willing to start adding some boundaries in
> areas with
11 matches
Mail list logo
