On 07/10/19 16:52, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
Thanks fella's - thought I remembered seeing some mention of them!
With only 2 expressing an opinion I am reluctant to put it on the wiki
guide.
What do you think Graeme? Anyone else?
___
Talk-au
Thanks fella's - thought I remembered seeing some mention of them!
On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 14:23, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Existing;
>
> amenity=community_centre
> community_centre:for=men
> name=North Sydney Men's Shed
>
>
> name=Parramatta District Men's Shed
> office=charity
>
>
On 07/10/19 14:02, Andrew Davidson wrote:
The current tagging for Australian botanical gardens is:
leisure=park 57
leisure=garden 43
leisure=nature_reserve 6
lesiure=playground 1
tourism=attraction 2
tourism=zoo 2
landuse=forest 1
no object tagging 1
It would appear that the parkiness is more
On 07/10/19 14:18, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
As per the title, what do we call a Men's Shed?
https://mensshed.org/ in case any of our overseas followers don't know
what we're talking about!
I'm guessing club=? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:club but what?
Not really a community
On 7/10/19 2:18 pm, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
As per the title, what do we call a Men's Shed?
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2018-January/011639.html
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
The current tagging for Australian botanical gardens is:
leisure=park 57
leisure=garden 43
leisure=nature_reserve 6
lesiure=playground 1
tourism=attraction 2
tourism=zoo 2
landuse=forest 1
no object tagging 1
It would appear that the parkiness is more interesting than the gardeny
Sorry. On reflection, I think I misunderstood your proposal.
I think your suggestion is consistent with the capital of a territory.
Apology for mis-reading proposal.
On Sun, 6 Oct 2019, at 2:53 PM, Joachim wrote:
> Hello Aussie mappers,
>
> a quick heads-up that i plan to change the capital
I understand the intent but I disagree.
I have a special interest in administrative boundaries and their implications
etc. As far as I am aware, Norfolk Island is still a territory of Australia.
It is now part of Australia but is not part of any state. Three other
territories in this
I believe the request is:
Request: *For all regions of the world that have their own road rules,
mapping standards/conventions, to enhance the common editors to support
region specific tagging. Additionally have the editor identify which region
you are editing in and switch to the correct
Hi.
A question of clarification:
Are you asking how to change the defaults when you yourself are editing?
Or are you wanting to raise a problem you see with the current defaults?
(This would seem to be a problem you perceive rather than a question.)
- Ben.
On Mon., 7 Oct. 2019, 10:05
Discussion J: regionalisation of editor presets
I am now putting the question at the top and bottom of the text.
## QUESTION
How can the presets for the editor (ID and JOSM) be changed to the ATG default
for the ACT when editing paths in this territory?
# The Issue (background)
What is the
Yes, I'm afraid that I can see an edit War starting here soon :-(
Thanks
Graeme
On Sun, 6 Oct 2019 at 19:53, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am concerned by the high frequency of reference to "laws and
> regulations" and "Australian Tagging Guidelines". If it is true that
> "95% of paths to
+1
On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 01:54, Joachim wrote:
> Hello Aussie mappers,
>
> a quick heads-up that i plan to change the capital tag[1] in Kingston
> (Norfolk Island) from "yes" to "4".[2]
> Rationale: Norfolk Island is not self-governing any more[3] and the
> boundary is admin_level=4 [4].
>
>
Hello Aussie mappers,
a quick heads-up that i plan to change the capital tag[1] in Kingston
(Norfolk Island) from "yes" to "4".[2]
Rationale: Norfolk Island is not self-governing any more[3] and the
boundary is admin_level=4 [4].
Seems to me a no-brainer but I don't want to step on any local
Hi,
I am concerned by the high frequency of reference to "laws and
regulations" and "Australian Tagging Guidelines". If it is true that
"95% of paths to do not comply with Australian Tagging Guidelines" then
I would suggest to adapt the guidelines to actual practice. After all,
hundreds of users
# Discussion I: Quality is the coherence of four things
Lots of good news but some bad.
Another way to look at the quality of the OSM data is the coherence of four
things:
1. What is found on the ground (real life)
2. The actual tagging found in OSM dataset
3. The Australian Tagging Guidelines
6 Oct 2019, 00:47 by talk-au@openstreetmap.org:
> Under ACT law, pedestrian and cyclists are both allowed to use any
> “footpath”. A "footpath" is any unsigned path separated from the road. There
> were 2190km of these "footpaths" as of 30 June 2012.
> Conclusion: in the ACT, almost all
17 matches
Mail list logo
