On 12/1/20 12:37 pm, Sebastian S. wrote:
When using OSMAnd for routing I came across the following note: "way has
been simplified using a error criteria of 3m" it is usually in green text.
Does anyone know what this means
It indicates that the number of points in the lines has been reduced by
& done!
Thanks
Graeme
On Sun, 12 Jan 2020 at 10:14, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
> Thanks fellas!
>
> Back to it, then :-)
>
> Graeme
>
>
> On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 22:08, Sebastian S. wrote:
>
>> I use a node for most.
>> Only if there is a distinct clearing in the middle of nowhere or a
By default OSMAnd shows things which may be of interest to mappers.
If you don't want to see these notes, you can turn the feature off.
On 12 January 2020 1:18:42 pm AEDT, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 12/1/20 12:37 pm, Sebastian S. wrote:
>> When using OSMAnd for routing I came
On 12/1/20 12:37 pm, Sebastian S. wrote:
When using OSMAnd for routing I came across the following note: "way
has been simplified using a error criteria of 3m" it is usually in
green text.
Does anyone know what this means, why do we need the note? What
purpose does it serve?
This is usually
When using OSMAnd for routing I came across the following note: "way has been
simplified using a error criteria of 3m" it is usually in green text.
Does anyone know what this means, why do we need the note? What purpose does it
serve?___
Talk-au
Thanks fellas!
Back to it, then :-)
Graeme
On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 22:08, Sebastian S. wrote:
> I use a node for most.
> Only if there is a distinct clearing in the middle of nowhere or a marked
> helipad then I use an area.
>
> On 11 January 2020 8:56:01 pm AEDT, Andrew Harvey <
>
I use a node for most.
Only if there is a distinct clearing in the middle of nowhere or a marked
helipad then I use an area.
On 11 January 2020 8:56:01 pm AEDT, Andrew Harvey
wrote:
>On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 17:56, Graeme Fitzpatrick
>
>wrote:
>
>> Question re this Map Roulette task, thanks.
>>
On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 17:56, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> Question re this Map Roulette task, thanks.
>
> I take it these details have come from a NPWS list of some form that says
> there is a landing site at "this" spot.
>
Yes that's right.
> So, even if it shows as just a patch of bare
There is no requirement. They can be anonymous if they prefer, best option
is whois data, but like many sites this one is by proxy so that doesn't
reveal anything.
On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 19:16, Sebastian S. wrote:
> I often wonder who puts these pages together.
> Is there no requirement to give
I often wonder who puts these pages together.
Is there no requirement to give contact or responsible person details by law in
Australia?
On 10 January 2020 1:30:06 pm AEDT, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Bush fire site for Vic/NSW with OSM attribution.. but data from other
>sources
I noticed the slow upper menus too.
If there a bug already existing that I can add to?
On 11 January 2020 5:07:25 pm AEDT, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 11/1/20 2:55 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
>> Ah at the Sydney Mapathon a few people were having the same problem
>> with the upper menus
11 matches
Mail list logo
