Re: [talk-au] Anzacathon and mapping possibilities

On 21/04/2020 23:57, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > On 21/04/2020 13:50, Warin wrote: >> On 21/4/20 7:57 pm, Daniel Pocock wrote: >>> On 21/04/2020 09:53, Greg Lauer wrote: Hi Daniel, As both a (very amateur) military historian who has visited many of battlefields/CWG's through

Re: [talk-au] Anzacathon and mapping possibilities

On 21/04/2020 13:50, Warin wrote: > On 21/4/20 7:57 pm, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> On 21/04/2020 09:53, Greg Lauer wrote: >>> Hi Daniel, >>> >>> As both a (very amateur) military historian who has visited many of >>> battlefields/CWG's through the Asia Pacific, Africa and Europe, as well >>> as an

Re: [talk-au] Anzacathon and mapping possibilities

On 21/4/20 7:57 pm, Daniel Pocock wrote: On 21/04/2020 09:53, Greg Lauer wrote: Hi Daniel, As both a (very amateur) military historian who has visited many of battlefields/CWG's through the Asia Pacific, Africa and Europe, as well as an Open Data proponent, I really like what you are trying

Re: [talk-au] Anzacathon and mapping possibilities

On 21/04/2020 09:53, Greg Lauer wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > As both a (very amateur) military historian who has visited many of > battlefields/CWG's through the Asia Pacific, Africa and Europe, as well > as an Open Data proponent, I really like what you are trying to do. But... > > The terms and

Re: [talk-au] Anzacathon and mapping possibilities

Hi Daniel, As both a (very amateur) military historian who has visited many of battlefields/CWG's through the Asia Pacific, Africa and Europe, as well as an Open Data proponent, I really like what you are trying to do. But... The terms and conditions of OSM in relation to data imports is fairly

Re: [talk-au] Anzacathon and mapping possibilities

On 21/04/2020 02:25, Warin wrote: > On 20/4/20 9:10 am, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> On 20/04/2020 00:49, Andrew Davidson wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 7:52 AM Daniel Pocock >> > wrote: >>> >>> The CWGC copyright notice appears to be compatible with a bulk import of