On 8/2/22 12:29, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 at 09:50, Andrew Harvey
wrote:
I think either awtgs= or hiking_scale:awtgs= are fine, I'd say
just pick one and start a wiki page describing the tag and how
it's used.
Personally, I like awtgs=*.
I prefer
Maybe just awtgs=* for officially assigned values and awtgs:informal=* for when
the mapper came up with it?
Or generally awtgs=*, but add a source:awtgs=official/”name of
organisation”/informal ?
Cheers,
Thorsten
From: Graeme Fitzpatrick
Sent: Tuesday, 8 February 2022 11:30
To:
On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 at 09:50, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> I think either awtgs= or hiking_scale:awtgs= are fine, I'd say just pick
> one and start a wiki page describing the tag and how it's used.
>
Personally, I like awtgs=*.
As I raised before I'm still not sure about how it would apply to
>
I think either awtgs= or hiking_scale:awtgs= are fine, I'd say just pick
one and start a wiki page describing the tag and how it's used.
As I raised before I'm still not sure about how it would apply to
individual ways vs route relations and if it's only tagged based on
officially assigned values
G'day all,
I'm trying to recall where we got to (if anywhere) on a consensus of how to
tag walking tracks with the Australian Walking Track Grading System (AWTGS)
scale??
I originally tagged then with awtgs=x. A well meaning guy in Germany then
deleted them thinking someone had made a
5 matches
Mail list logo
