On 8/2/22 12:29, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 at 09:50, Andrew Harvey <[email protected]>
wrote:
I think either awtgs= or hiking_scale:awtgs= are fine, I'd say
just pick one and start a wiki page describing the tag and how
it's used.
Personally, I like awtgs=*.
I prefer hiking_scale:awtgs= as you know that it is a hiking scale ..
even if you don't know what awtgs is.
As I raised before I'm still not sure about how it would apply to
individual ways vs route relations and if it's only tagged based
on officially assigned values or if mappers can evaluate and
decide the value on their own.
Looking at those guidelines, it's up to each Council / Organisation to
work out the value by the "worst" feature of any particular track, so
I'd think we could do the same - follow the guidelines then designate
this track as "Grade 3"?
+1
The individual ways carry the worst rating for that way ... this would
allow selection of ways that are within capability by simply removing
those above the required level.
Routes are a different problem .... while the worst one could be
included .. what happens if/when things change? Possibly better to leave
it off? Consider that some routes have alternatives, excursions...
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
