Re: [talk-au] Tagging for the router

If the wiki says no then I withdraw my suggestion. Don't want to ruffle too many feathers. Sorry for not having read the mapping guidelines. On 1 Sep 2016 9:38 AM, "Nick Hocking" wrote: > "My suggestion is that the map data is the best place to store that > information."

Re: [talk-au] Tagging for the router

I think that the idea that car navigation is for visitors would mean that it was very important that the routes that get displayed know about local custom. My suggestion is that the map data is the best place to store that information. On 31 Aug 2016 11:42 PM, "Nick Hocking"

Re: [talk-au] Brisbane river

modify the data in QGIS and then generate the map. Cheers Ross On 20/07/15 13:52, Phillip and Kerrie wrote: yes I would just be closing the river bank ways. And yes I am tagging for the renderer. I am making maps for my employer, in QGIS and mapinfo, and wanted to use the OMS data

Re: [talk-au] Brisbane river

Thank you Ross for the pointer about my tool chain. I have now found a much more comprehensive import tool set and am able to produce the picture that I am looking for. On 20 July 2015 at 16:26, Phillip and Kerrie phil...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks, I will now go away and look into using

[talk-au] Brisbane river

HI, I recently downloaded the openstreetmap data for parts of South East Queensland. When I imported this data into GIS, I found that the waterways were not always closed objects. Having the wide rivers as closed objects means that waterways import as polygons and that makes making good looking

Re: [talk-au] Brisbane river

manipulating the data to create the output you want. Cheers Ross [1]http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Driverbank [2]http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Driver On 20/07/15 13:17, Phillip and Kerrie wrote: HI, I recently downloaded the openstreetmap data for parts