On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Alex Kwiatkowski <
alex.kwiatkow...@nearmap.com> wrote:
> Which part is contradictory so a can give them a starting point.
>
"If you derive information from observing our PhotoMaps, and include
that information in a work, you will own that work, and may distribute
Hi John,
Which part is contradictory so a can give them a starting point.
Regards Alex Kwiatkowski
Email: alex.kwiatkow...@nearmap.com
Mobile: 0421 794 183
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-
2009/12/10 Alex Kwiatkowski :
> I hope that clears it up for you guys and feel free to get in contact with
> me if you have any other queries.
You might want to get the legal dept. to sort out the contridictory
clause about owning the data and what license you must license it
under etc.
_
I've just got a response from our legal team and this is what they say.
"We are always keen to clear up any uncertainties regarding derived works.
Our requirement is that derived works are availlable to others, using a
Creative Commons style license. In other words, we share the same approach
as O
I'm sure Alex is reading the list, but I am too :)
If there are concerns with our license, we'll work to address them - a key
goal of ours is to support OSM and that was a firm requirement when the
license was drafted.
Cheers
Ben
2009/12/9 James Livingston
> On 09/12/2009, at 6:38 PM, Roy Wall
On 09/12/2009, at 6:38 PM, Roy Wallace wrote:
> "If you derive information from observing our PhotoMaps, and include
> that information in a work, you will own that work, and may distribute
> it to others under a Creative Commons licence."
>
> Does that not imply that the derived information may o
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, John Smith wrote:
> Although. If CC-BY-SA isn't likely to stand in Australia for OSM
> it isn't likely to stand for anyone else either
If its good enough for the Au guvmint, who can afford lawyers, it is probably
protective in Au.
--
You have had a long-term stimulat
2009/12/9 Liz :
> On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, John Smith wrote:
>> Nearmap allows in their T&C's to derive data, the data is under the
>> license of the person deriving it chooses to release it under.
>>
>> The bigger issue was the AU Govt data, but that has fixed it self
>> since it was relicensed as cc-b
2009/12/9 Roy Wallace :
> Hmm...the following is from
> http://www.nearmap.com/legal/community-licence.aspx:
>
> "If you derive information from observing our PhotoMaps, and include
> that information in a work, you will own that work, and may distribute
> it to others under a Creative Commons lic
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:26 PM, John Smith wrote:
> 2009/12/9 Roy Wallace :
>> If The License Change goes ahead, will that have any influence on, say, the
>> legality of tracing from nearmap imagery?
>> Does it appear as though some contributions will have to be removed if The
>> License Change ha
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, John Smith wrote:
> Nearmap allows in their T&C's to derive data, the data is under the
> license of the person deriving it chooses to release it under.
>
> The bigger issue was the AU Govt data, but that has fixed it self
> since it was relicensed as cc-by from cc-by-sa
but it
2009/12/9 Roy Wallace :
> If The License Change goes ahead, will that have any influence on, say, the
> legality of tracing from nearmap imagery?
> Does it appear as though some contributions will have to be removed if The
> License Change happens?
> If so, what kind of contributions?
Nearmap allo
If The License Change goes ahead, will that have any influence on, say, the
legality of tracing from nearmap imagery?
Does it appear as though some contributions will have to be removed if The
License Change happens?
If so, what kind of contributions?
_
13 matches
Mail list logo
