2010/1/12 Roy Rankin rran...@ihug.com.au:
The example I gave was a simplification to demonstrate the issues. From
Johns response I did realize I had gotten the directions which I assumed
is why it did not make sense to him. If you want to visualize the
situation look at the link I supplied
There is a third solution which I have seen. Typically the interchange
ways cross 2 other ways. Normally I think of the via in a turn relation
being a node. I am not sure the routers work this way, but if the right
turn lane is a separate way with a common nodes with ways it crosses
(but
2010/1/12 Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com:
Likewise don't put roads that are on the same pavement on different layers
it's not mapping what's on the ground.
I know it's difficult with the current routers but we need to add the data
correctly then get the routers fixed to correctly work with
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 3:57 PM, cam_...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 21:44 +1100, Roy Rankin wrote:
With the resolution and newness of Nearmap images Freeway/Motorway
interchanges are being mapped in detail rather than schematically. This
brings up the issue on how to best do
2010/1/12 Roy Rankin rran...@ihug.com.au:
My experience of many years with both people and computers is that
people often show that common sense is not that common and that
computers have none at all. It may be just a fringe case, but I believe
that if a turn is not prohibited then sooner or
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
KISS...
In this case you have to assume the turn restictions are completely
ignored, which if that is the case is there really any point in
putting them in in the first place to tell stupid things how to do
their jobs better when the programming
2010/1/13 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:17 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
In this case you have to assume the turn restictions are completely
ignored, which if that is the case is there really any point in
putting them in in the first place to
2010/1/13 Sam Couter s...@couter.id.au:
Left turn from Falcon Street onto Pacifiy Highway.
If you switch to sat view you can see there is a seperate lane for
that which makes the turn less than 90 degrees.
___
Talk-au mailing list
With the resolution and newness of Nearmap images Freeway/Motorway
interchanges are being mapped in detail rather than schematically. This
brings up the issue on how to best do this.
Picture this case. A freeway goes north-south and a dual lane east-west
road goes over the freeway with a
2010/1/11 Roy Rankin rran...@ihug.com.au:
With the resolution and newness of Nearmap images Freeway/Motorway
interchanges are being mapped in detail rather than schematically. This
brings up the issue on how to best do this.
Picture this case. A freeway goes north-south and a dual lane
Oops,
I meant a east bound lane(s) going south crossing the west bound lane(s).
On 01/11/2010 09:44 PM, Roy Rankin wrote:
With the resolution and newness of Nearmap images Freeway/Motorway
interchanges are being mapped in detail rather than schematically. This
brings up the issue on how to
On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 21:44 +1100, Roy Rankin wrote:
With the resolution and newness of Nearmap images Freeway/Motorway
interchanges are being mapped in detail rather than schematically. This
brings up the issue on how to best do this.
...
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:57 PM, cam_...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Would anyone else like to comment?
Yes, but as John asked can you point us to the example? Would make it
easier to follow...
As for 2 The ways cross without a common node but are on different
layers. (Although physically using the
The example I gave was a simplification to demonstrate the issues. From
Johns response I did realize I had gotten the directions which I assumed
is why it did not make sense to him. If you want to visualize the
situation look at the link I supplied
14 matches
Mail list logo
