On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:38 AM, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like this has been done again
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/6132651
The whole closed way bays that I added have been deleted. I consider
this is vandalism,
I think that you would be wrong.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:03 AM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:38 AM, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com
wrote:
Looks like this has been done again
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/6132651
The whole closed way bays that I added have been
On 25 October 2010 10:01, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
So effectivly in my view swanilli has deleated the bays I originally
added as nodes, and then put them back in as new nodes with a
different ID, while at the same time removing some of the tags I
originally had without
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Ian Sergeant inas66+...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 October 2010 10:01, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
So effectivly in my view swanilli has deleated the bays I originally
[ ... ]
Clearly done the wrong thing, IMO.
I think there is still room to
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com
To: OSM Australian Talk List talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 11:51 PM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Port Hacking (Bay v. Water)
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Markus_g marku...@bigpond.com wrote
-boun...@openstreetmap.org
[mailto:talk-au-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of David Groom
Sent: Thursday, 21 October 2010 8:36 PM
To: OSM Australian Talk List
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Port Hacking (Bay v. Water)
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com
To: OSM
Too many edits for me to keep track of, and it is hard to read every
change file to understand exactly what has been changed. So I would
find it helpful if the changes to Port Hacking/surronding bays are
discussed and explained here, if it won't fit in the comment. Thanks.
Of Andrew Harvey
Sent: Thursday, 21 October 2010 9:46 PM
To: OSM Australian Talk List
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Port Hacking (Bay v. Water)
Too many edits for me to keep track of, and it is hard to read every
change file to understand exactly what has been changed. So I would
find it helpful if the changes
Looks like this has been done again
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/6132651
The whole closed way bays that I added have been deleted. I consider
this is vandalism, what should I do?
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Markus_g marku...@bigpond.com wrote:
All of the inner bays that
I should follow up on the reasons why I added these bays as a closed way.
First the bay is the whole body of water, not just some point in the middle.
Second, using a way allows renderers to for instance render names for
large bays at low zooms, and not render names for small bays untill
very
] On Behalf Of Andrew Harvey
Sent: Wednesday, 20 October 2010 9:21 AM
To: OSM Australian Talk List
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Port Hacking (Bay v. Water)
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Markus_g marku...@bigpond.com wrote:
Well at the moment it isn't rendering correctly as there is no coastline
It seems Port Hacking has been subject to some edit warring.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/285916/history
My view is that it is not a bay. Its name doesn't have bay, its more
of a lake, or just a body of water, I would have thought.
What is the consenus here? Should it be tagged
...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Harvey
Sent: Tuesday, 19 October 2010 10:14 PM
To: OSM Australian Talk List
Subject: [talk-au] Port Hacking (Bay v. Water)
It seems Port Hacking has been subject to some edit warring.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/285916/history
My view is that it is not a bay
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Markus_g marku...@bigpond.com wrote:
Well at the moment it isn't rendering correctly as there is no coastline
across the entrance.
I see you've fix that now.
Well to be tagged as natural=water it should be a body of standing water,
such as a lake or pond.
On 20 October 2010 09:51, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
Also it seems the main boundary for Port Hacking is a way traced from
Yahoo, it is close to the ABS administrative boarder, I was wondering
if we should just place the Port Hacking boarder on the ABS boundary.
I really
15 matches
Mail list logo
