Dear list Im tired and muddled. I think Sebastian posted swapped the 2
issues when he posted, sorry if its my mistake
Quoting fors...@ozonline.com.au:
Hi Sebastian
A quick reply now, its late, and maybe more considered tomorrow
its tagged highway=track
I can see no "access all=yes" so
Hi all, I see Sebastian has posted to the list now
background to this: Way History: 679145843
about a year ago Sebastian had bicycle=no, highway=track
as part of the DWG sanctioned revert I deleted the bicycle=no
Hi Sebastian
a bit more,
If I wanted to add tags I would go on site have a look
The access tag doesn't really capture if it's private property or not. You
can have private property which is open to the public, and you can have
public lands closed to the public. So you can't really set the access tag
just on the basis of it being private land as it all depends how it's
signed
Hi Sebastian
access=privateAccess is only with permission on an individual basis
access=destinationTransit traffic forbidden
access=permissive open to general traffic until such time as the
owner revoke the permission
My inclination is that if you are not sure, don't use the
In using the tag access=permissive, how does one verify that access has not
been revoked by the owner?
In one of the changesets in question, the site clearly private property (as it
is a retirement village)
I would have thought that access=private would have been a better tag to use in
lieu of
Hi
I have left a changeset comment alerting him to the talk-au discussion.
Tony
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 at 10:22, wrote:
Then there are networks that are clearly signed indicating Transit
traffic is forbidden. These are the only places I would use the
access=destination tag.
Have I got it
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 at 10:22, wrote:
> Then there are networks that are clearly signed indicating Transit
> traffic is forbidden. These are the only places I would use the
> access=destination tag.
>
> Have I got it right? Right enough to revert any tagging that does not
> conform?
>
See also
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 at 11:42, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> Personally, yes, these & similar are the only times I would use that e.g.
> https://goo.gl/maps/ACMTnn6gQJTLz5NF6 (& as always, for illustration
> only!)
>
That sign looks like hgv=no. So no heavy goods vehicles, but anyone else
can use
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 at 09:22, wrote:
>
> Then there are networks that are clearly signed indicating Transit
> traffic is forbidden. These are the only places I would use the
> access=destination tag.
>
Personally, yes, these & similar are the only times I would use that e.g.
oops, forgot to add these
Multiple entrances with restricting signage
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/-37.83471/145.03179 (Scotch College)
Multiple entrances gated and signed (Museum, Carlton Gardens)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/209893402
Multiple entrances gatedand signed
Hi all
Up to now I have only questioned Sebastian (HighRouleur) on his
information sources and reasoning on the use of access=destination
First going to the wiki: "Transit traffic forbidden, all non-transit
traffic to a given element allowed."
But I am aware that the wiki does not trump
11 matches
Mail list logo
