I noticed this dataset too, but could never figure out how to open it
with JOSM.
Andrew Harvey, have you checked out these files? And do you have any
plans to convert them?
If we plan on doing a wider scale import I would suggest separating each
stream into its own .osm file so we could check
On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 at 06:53, Andrew Davidson wrote:
> Perennial streams are pretty rare in Australia. If you used the literal never
> stops flowing definition, there would be almost none.
Downstream of dams are commonly perennial since the dam will often let
through a constant flow to maintain
On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:05 nwastra, wrote:
>
> *Should all those flagged as non-perennial be tagged as intermittent?
>
Yes.
Seems to be too few perennial but as others have mentioned Australian
> watercourses are predominantly intermittent.
Perennial streams are pretty rare in Australia. If
More specifically...
The watercourses are flagged as perennial or non-perennial or null
*Should all those flagged as non-perennial be tagged as intermittent?
Seems to be too few perennial but as others have mentioned Australian
watercourses are predominantly intermittent.
On 21/05/18 19:16, cleary wrote:
I am struggling with how to use "ephemeral" rather than the "intermittent" tag,
particularly when it comes to on-the-ground verification.
Good point. However ...
If the Todd River is ephemeral then by extrapolation other waterways in the
surrounding area
I am struggling with how to use "ephemeral" rather than the "intermittent" tag,
particularly when it comes to on-the-ground verification.
I have travelled in some rural and outback areas in western NSW and Queensland
and, to a lesser extent, in South Australia. I also regularly look at
I have started a draft for ephemeral.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/ephemeral
On 19/05/18 12:08, Ian Sergeant wrote:
On 19/05/18 11:38, Ian Sergeant wrote:
flow=ephemeral, maybe. water-presence=ephemeral?
On 19 May 2018 at 11:44, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>
On 19/05/18 11:38, Ian Sergeant wrote:
> flow=ephemeral, maybe. water-presence=ephemeral?
On 19 May 2018 at 11:44, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 'ephemeral=yes' matches the present use of 'intermittent=yes'. I like at
> least some consistency in the tagging.
I think you picked the
On 19/05/18 11:38, Ian Sergeant wrote:
On 19 May 2018 at 11:34, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
Some are using stream=ephemeral ... low usage.
I'd rather go with ephemeral=yes as that then can be used on 'lakes' and
other things.
flow=ephemeral, maybe. water-presence=ephemeral?
Ian.
On 19 May 2018 at 11:34, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Some are using stream=ephemeral ... low usage.
> I'd rather go with ephemeral=yes as that then can be used on 'lakes' and
> other things.
flow=ephemeral, maybe. water-presence=ephemeral?
Ian.
On 19/05/18 11:02, Andrew Davidson wrote:
On 16/05/18 07:35, Warin wrote:
Many inland waters in Australia are 'intermittent' meaning they only
flow when there is rain and that rain may only occur every 5 years or
so on average.
The vast majority of Australian stream are non-perennial. The
On 16/05/18 23:26, Andrew Harvey wrote:
GA also has a Surface Hydrology dataset [2] [3] [4] which could be used
as well.
+1
This is a good source as it covers all of the country and in effect has
the datasets from the states we already have permission from. It's also
useful for getting
On 16/05/18 08:51, Ewen Hill wrote:
There are also a number of areas I think in SA that have been inundated by
streams from a data source and these could possibly be trimmed back. Flood
water on flat deserts will make its own mind up next time. I would be really
keen to hear more and thank you
On 16/05/18 07:35, Warin wrote:
Many inland waters in Australia are 'intermittent' meaning they only
flow when there is rain and that rain may only occur every 5 years or so
on average.
The vast majority of Australian stream are non-perennial. The WSJ has a
cool slider that shows this:
/MapServer/6
Cheers - Phil
From: Andrew Wiseman [mailto:andrew_wise...@apple.com]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2018 10:07 AM
To: OSM Australian Talk List
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Correcting inland water features
Thanks for the feedback and suggestions everyone, that’s very helpful. We have
also
Thanks for the feedback and suggestions everyone, that’s very helpful. We have
also added AGRI to our list of sources.
Where the inland water meets the coastlines, we have seen a few different
styles of modeling so I wanted to see if you had a local policy about it.
In some cases we’ve seen
Agreed with Warin and Ewen.
I'd like to point out the AGRI imagery [1], yes it's old (2006-2011), black
and white, and missing parts of the imagery due to cloud and seams, but it
may help as an extra source to compare. It's good enough to make out rivers
and it should be accurate positionally
Andrew,
Welcome. As Warin mentioned, the vast majority of waterways are
intermittent outside the great dividing range and coastal areas and a map,
source and accuracy unknow is available as an example
On 16/05/18 03:05, Andrew Wiseman wrote:
Hello,
My name is Andrew, I work for Apple’s Maps team. We are interested in
doing some fixes and improvements to inland water features in
Australia on OSM, such as adding and improving geometry of polygons
for lakes and wide rivers, fixing broken
19 matches
Mail list logo