On 5/13/2016 11:36 AM, Warin wrote:
On 5/6/2016 9:51 AM, Simon Slater wrote:
On Thu, 5 May 2016 10:10:35 AM Ian Sergeant wrote:
1. Any attempt to make something render on sparse parts of the map, is
a rendering issue. Any renderer is free to pre-process the data based
on a population and
I agree that there is a need to improve our classification of places.
However I think that taking population as the sole criterion will create
more discrepancies than we have already.
For example, I live in a Sydney suburb that has a population greater
than the gazetted "state suburb" of
On 5/14/2016 11:30 AM, Simon Slater wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2016 07:11:39 PM Warin wrote:
2 things:
First, I may have mussed up the threading here but the subject of Warin's last
thread looked like "ￜￜￜￜ...". My e-mail client has been playing
silly-buggers lately, so was this the intended
On 5/13/2016 9:22 PM, cleary wrote:
I agree that there is a need to improve our classification of places.
However I think that taking population as the sole criterion will
create more discrepancies than we have already.
I think of it as a guide. In fact most of the OSM wiki to me is a guide.
On Fri, 13 May 2016 07:11:39 PM Warin wrote:
2 things:
First, I may have mussed up the threading here but the subject of Warin's last
thread looked like "ￜￜￜￜ...". My e-mail client has been playing
silly-buggers lately, so was this the intended subject or just my client?
> I have
5 matches
Mail list logo
