Re: [talk-au] Import vs filtering query

Hi Ian, How would you match the different map set, the government one to OSM? And how will you validate the matching is correct? Regards, John On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 14:41, stevea wrote: > To be clear, Ian, I'm not saying this use of data is an import, as you > have said and as it appears to

Re: [talk-au] Import vs filtering query

To be clear, Ian, I'm not saying this use of data is an import, as you have said and as it appears to me and others, it is / would be using the data as a "filtering process" in a workflow. As such, I'm good with that. The points I was making are that 1) data drift over time and 2) there are

Re: [talk-au] New Bing imagery?

On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 12:35, Adam Horan wrote: > What I did notice though is that some footpath shapes matched those in > openstreetmap, paths through parks and nature reserves especially. > Including one that I mapped only a matter of weeks ago! Thanks Graeme

Re: [talk-au] New Bing imagery?

What I did notice though is that some footpath shapes matched those in openstreetmap, paths through parks and nature reserves especially. I also see they've got a ©OpenStreetMap in the bottom right corner - not sure if that's always been there. On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 09:22, Sam Wilson wrote: >

Re: [talk-au] Import vs filtering query

I also wouldn't consider this an import, because you're just using the data to filter down potential issues which you then cross reference with other sources. On Sat, 4 Sept 2021 at 20:55, Little Maps wrote: > Hi all, my understanding is that the process described below is a big > filtering

Re: [talk-au] New Bing imagery?

I'm not sure what the best way is, but the imagery on bing.com/maps appears to be the same as what's available in the WMS service, so it's probably quicker to check there than to fire up an editor. I found an edge of the high-res stuff in Dandenong South (would link

Re: [talk-au] New Bing imagery?

On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 08:38, Stéphane Guillou < stephane.guil...@member.fsf.org> wrote: > Still hasn't reached us, in my part of Meanjin/Brisbane at least. > Nor on the Gold Coast :-( Thanks Graeme ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org

Re: [talk-au] New Bing imagery?

Still hasn't reached us, in my part of Meanjin/Brisbane at least. Nowadays, what is the best way to track: - How old the imagery is? - Where the latest update is available? - Zoom level availability? Cheers On 2/9/21 9:08 am, Adam Horan wrote: I can't see it in the suburbs of Melbourne

Re: [talk-au] [EXTERNAL] Re: Low quality road classification contributions in SA via Microsoft Open Maps Team - contact point?

Good evening all, I have spent a bit of time exploring the changesets in SA by the MSOMT and reviewed all residential roads and 1/13th of service roads. There were some significant wins with a lot of the edits that vastly improve SA however there could be some improvements with 1. Private

Re: [talk-au] Import vs filtering query

Hi Your proposed workflow would seem to be totally OK to me and is clearly not an import. List the government data in the sources used in the changeset and IMHO you are good to go. Simon Am 04.09.2021 um 12:51 schrieb Little Maps: Hi all, my understanding is that the process described