It makes a lot of sense. In the states / USA, we (OSM as state and governments
rather naturally cleave here for us) "split at state boundaries" all the time
(as regards to highways and routes). It is "sane in the long run" I believe is
widely believed.
Things "come into better focus" for
Hello Andrew, and all.
I've updated the draft guidelines to document these changes. I've
included an example of how it would be tagged.
What are your thoughts?
Dian
On 2022-08-18 09:44, Dian Ågesson wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I really like what you're suggesting here. I'll adjust the draft I
Hi Andrew,
I really like what you're suggesting here. I'll adjust the draft I
linked earlier to reflect what you've proposed below.
If everyone is happy with the draft we can integrate it into our tagging
guidelines proper.
Dian
On 2022-08-18 08:51, Andrew Hughes wrote:
Hi Dian,
Hi Dian,
Working with the National Heavy Vehicle Regulator and having data that
honours the jurisdiction geography (I.e. state/territory border) is
invaluable to us.
I believe... Ways and State Route (relations) should split at the border.
State routes typically form as members of the national
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 2:18 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> & how would we work "Highway 1", with its myriad of alternative designations
> & names?
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highway_1_(Australia)
>
How much of "Highway 1" is actually left? As far as I know only the
bit in Western
Hi.
This is a national route, rather than a state route, so we don't have that
problem.
- Ben.
On Fri, 12 Aug 2022 at 14:15, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, 12 Aug 2022 at 13:37, Ben Kelley wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm guessing more than one state has an A40.
>>
>
> & how would we work
Excellent pick up Ben.
For routes that cross state borders, I would favour using AU:NAT (or
AU:COM/AU:FED/AU:AUS, something that says "interstate or national).
I could also see an argument for creating a seperate relation for each
state, with a national superrelation…. To be that seems
On Fri, 12 Aug 2022 at 13:37, Ben Kelley wrote:
>
> I'm guessing more than one state has an A40.
>
& how would we work "Highway 1", with its myriad of alternative
designations & names?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highway_1_(Australia)
Thanks
Graeme
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 1:37 PM Ben Kelley wrote:
>
> I think we'll need a state component in the network (for state roads).
>
> I'm guessing more than one state has an A40.
>
> ref=A40, network=AU won't be enough for that.
>
That seems to be fairly standard in other countries. So
I think we'll need a state component in the network (for state roads).
I'm guessing more than one state has an A40.
ref=A40, network=AU won't be enough for that.
- Ben.
On Fri, 12 Aug 2022 at 12:55, Dian Ågesson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've cobbled together a draft model of how we could adopt the
Hi,
I've cobbled together a draft model of how we could adopt the "AU"
prefix within the network tags based on some of the issues raised in the
previous thread.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Diacritic/Proposed_Australian_Routes
Would really appreciate your thoughts and
11 matches
Mail list logo
