Hi Dian, Working with the National Heavy Vehicle Regulator and having data that honours the jurisdiction geography (I.e. state/territory border) is invaluable to us.
I believe... Ways and State Route (relations) should split at the border. State routes typically form as members of the national route... therefore I would say .. 1. Ways are split or borders 2. Ways are members of state route relations network=AU:QLD 3. State relations are members of a national relation (if they make up the national network) network=AU I believe there is far less entropy in this convention as well. Thoughts? Cheers. Andrew On Fri, 12 Aug 2022, 2:38 pm Dian Ågesson, <[email protected]> wrote: > Excellent pick up Ben. > > For routes that cross state borders, I would favour using AU:NAT (or > AU:COM/AU:FED/AU:AUS, something that says “interstate or national). > > I could also see an argument for creating a seperate relation for each > state, with a national superrelation…. To be that seems like too much > overhead. > > Dian > > > On 2022-08-12 04:15, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 12 Aug 2022 at 13:37, Ben Kelley <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I'm guessing more than one state has an A40. > > > & how would we work "Highway 1", with its myriad of alternative > designations & names? > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highway_1_(Australia) > > Thanks > > Graeme > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
