I have been doing a cleanup of Marrickville routes.
For routes that have a reference (and a relation on
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sydney_Cycle_Routes#Marrickville ) these
are now done:
* L1
* L4
* L6
* L7
* L8
* L10
* L11
* L12 (pretty short route really)
* L13
L2 and L5 seem to get
On 31 July 2012 11:49, Sam Russell g.samuelruss...@gmail.com wrote:
Where route numbers are in repair or in repair but separated by clear
intervening route signs, keep the route ref and name.
Where route numbers are in disrepair copy key:ref=L# to key:old_ref=L#?
My Saturday ride is
On 30 July 2012 16:18, Barker, Nicholas nbar...@pb.com.au wrote:
** **
I think we have to forget that data ever existed (which is somewhat sad
but ah well onwards and upwards with the mapping eh)
Agreed.
On the subject of Marrickville cycle routes, I know they were one of the
only
Ian wrote,
On the subject of Marrickville cycle routes, I know they were one of the
only councils in Sydney with nicely numbered routes from point to point.
However, the route numbers have gone off their web page. The few route
numbers that remain around the LGA are in disrepair, and most
I emailed the Bike Marrickville list, and the consensus seems to be to keep
them where they are signposted.
Still waiting on a response from someone on the council as to what their
future strategy on signage is. I have seen internal documents using these
references, as well as RRxx for regional
5 matches
Mail list logo
