Hi Frederik
This reminds me of a thread that I started on this list about 2 years
ago. It related to illegal mountain bike tracks in Lysterfield Park,
Victoria Australia.
The construction and use of unauthorized trails is illegal with large
penalties (though I have never heard of a
Tony,
On 9/11/19 21:31, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
> The construction and use of unauthorized trails is illegal with large
> penalties (though I have never heard of a prosecution).
Are there sources that are not restricted by copyright that we could use
to determine which trails are
On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 at 06:23, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> On 9/11/19 21:31, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
> > The construction and use of unauthorized trails is illegal with large
> > penalties (though I have never heard of a prosecution).
>
> Are there sources that are not restricted by copyright
On 12/9/19 05:31, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
Since then the pressure from the mountain bike community to has map
everything has reduced, presumably the mountain bike community has
realized that OSM is one of the tools the authorities use to locate
illegal trails.
That's only going to
On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 at 13:45, Greg Lauer wrote:
> Hi Frederick,
>
> There is 'authoratative' data available for NPWS estate -
> https://data.nsw.gov.au/data/dataset?q=NPWS+track===_format=_id==score+desc%2C+metadata_modified+desc
> and
> we have a waiver -
>
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 23:40, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the DWG was drawn into an edit war regarding several paths that were
> mapped in this area:
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/-34.3740/150.8761
>
> The argument is about in how far the (largely north-south running) paths
> are
Hi,
On 12.09.19 06:27, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> It's always better to have this mapped based on confirmations on the
> ground, and it appears in this case that the local mapper Zhent, has
> been mapping based on local knowledge.
I have a feeling that Zhent's "foot=yes" might not mean "there is a
Hi Frederick,
There is 'authoratative' data available for NPWS estate -
https://data.nsw.gov.au/data/dataset?q=NPWS+track===_format=_id==score+desc%2C+metadata_modified+desc
and
we have a waiver -
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_data_catalogue. The problem
is that the data is not
Hi,
the DWG was drawn into an edit war regarding several paths that were
mapped in this area:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/-34.3740/150.8761
The argument is about in how far the (largely north-south running) paths
are "illegal" and whether they need to be removed from the map because
9 matches
Mail list logo
