Echoing what cleary said about reliance on the DCS Base Map, it's not our
goal to recreate their label format.
In my opinion it's more important to have branch and ref tagged as it gives
more flexibility to data consumers on how they choose to label it, eg. they
could choose,
{branch} FS
On 12/2/23 21:02, cleary wrote:
In principle, I agree with Warin. My problem is relying on the Base Map as an
authoritative source for names when there is other information.
What 'other information' that is OSM compatible for copyright? Note
'other information' can be used to find stuff but
In principle, I agree with Warin. My problem is relying on the Base Map as an
authoritative source for names when there is other information.
I just looked at Lane Cove Fire Station which has been recently re-tagged. It
looks good to me.
___
Talk-au
On 12/2/23 09:30, cleary wrote:
I have one further comment about obsolete information on the DCS NSW Base Map.
Located at 744 Carnarvon Highway, just north of Moree is a building that is
labelled on the Base Map as OTC Satellite Earth Station. As far as I could find
out, it ceased to have
I have one further comment about obsolete information on the DCS NSW Base Map.
Located at 744 Carnarvon Highway, just north of Moree is a building that is
labelled on the Base Map as OTC Satellite Earth Station. As far as I could find
out, it ceased to have that purpose about 35 years ago but
The DCS NSW Base Map is a great resource but some aspects do not seem to get
updated e.g. roads that were once public but are now private may still appear
on the map to have former status (e.g. parts of unincorporated area in western
NSW), re-named roads may still show old names, waterways show
6 matches
Mail list logo
