I also notice that the full stretch of NLEX is not centered to the
public traces:
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4093/4884592855_a6dbfb1332_b.jpg
Doesn't really matter much but perhaps others can look into it in detail.
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com
Hmmm... is it possible to place everything else without an explicit Garmin
hex code to a catch-all generic POI category? That would make everything
that has a name searchable in the Garmin map.
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:03 AM, maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11,
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:21 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmmm... is it possible to place everything else without an explicit Garmin
hex code to a catch-all generic POI category?
This is done on two features as well,
building=yes and shop=* for all those shops I can't find a
Dear dominique28,
Thanks for reporting this. I am open to adding residential polygons to the
garmin map, however, there are lot of data inconsistency at the moment.
Villages/subdivision names are tagged either as:
1. point, place=hamlet
2. point, place=village
2. area, landuse=residential
We
2010/8/11 Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com
Renaud MICHEL wrote:
Le mercredi 11 août 2010 à 13:26, Ben Laenen a écrit :
You could fill in the roles of those nodes in the relation of course.
I've even seen the bus stop nodes being numbered, so you'd get
something like stop_15 as a role.
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Ivo De Broeck ivo.debro...@gmail.com wrote:
I do not understand this. I have used Potlatch and have put in disorder all
members of the relation. Then i have used the relationchecker and all
members came in the right way. This was for a oneway buss-route.
The
Hi all,
finally a new step in the licensing process: you now can voluntarily agree to
the new contributer terms at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/terms
Check http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Contributor_Terms_Summary to
see what it actually means compared to the old terms.
Note
Why couldn't this be added to CT Section 3 saying.
If the OSMF does decide to change the licence, any existing data that may
then not be compatible will need to be removed.
Would this then make cc-by existing data compatible with the new licence?
Markus_g
25, Markus marku...@bigpond.com wrote:
Why couldn't this be added to CT Section 3 saying.
If the OSMF does decide to change the licence, any existing data that may
then not be compatible will need to be removed.
Would this then make cc-by existing data compatible with the new licence?
I
At 12:02 PM 11/08/2010, David Groom wrote:
2) Where does PD data (mainly TIGER, NHS, NPS, NAIP imagery, USGS imagery)
fall with regards to contributor terms, specifically You have **explicit**
permission from the rights holder to submit the Contents and grant the
licence below?'
The general
- Original Message -
From: Mike Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org;
David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net
Cc: OSMF License Working Group le...@osmfoundation.org
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 2:36 PM
Subject: Re:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Mike Collinson wrote:
At 02:58 PM 12/08/2010, Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote:
PS: I'd be interested to know if the current CTs have had any legal
review from OSMF's lawyers...
Yes. Our initial desire was to have something very short, more in-line with
what is now the
Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Yahoo aerial imagery is supplied under some terms (sorry too lazy to look them
up right now). Sometime in the past someone(s) from within the OSM project
asked them if tracing from those images to make a map was possible within
those terms. They answered:
Sam Vekemans acrosscanadatrails at gmail.com writes:
hi,
after checking the 'in addition make pd' box, is there a way to
'uncheck' that box if we change are mind at a later date? say, if i
discover more information that would make me change my mind.
(i can with google photos, as an
i followed the link under my settings
Contributor Terms: You have not yet agreed to the new Contributor Terms.
Please follow this link at your convenience to review and accept the new
Contributor Terms.
in the top paragraph there is this section
“Please read the following terms and
As promised, and long awaited, the next phase of the OSM License Upgrade has
arrived. Phase 2 - Existing Contributor Voluntary Re-licensing [1] has begun,
and you may indicate your acceptance of the new Contributor Terms for your
existing OSM API account. To accept the terms visit
Am 12.08.2010 10:18, schrieb Martin Fossdal Guttesen:
i followed the link under my settings
i can’t find either a “Accept” or “Decline” button, just a “Agree” button
what to do ?
Leave it unchecked, close the browser page or go one page back.
Peter
On 11/08/10 21:56, Liz wrote:
There are a list of questions which have not been answered whether on osmf-
talk or legal-talk or talk.
I also find that is a problem with the mailing list, and when I contact
the working groups. No definitive answer is provided, usually the
discussion gets
On 12/08/10 09:18, Martin Fossdal Guttesen wrote:
in the top paragraph there is this section
“Please read the following terms and conditions carefully and click
either the 'Accept' or 'Decline' button at the bottom to continue.”
i can’t find either a “Accept” or “Decline” button, just a
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
So the newbies have chosen to join this mailing list, so they at least have
seen the list of mailinglists. Why didn't they join legal? or dev= because
they're not interested in those topics, they have enough to do with mapping
their village.
On 12 August 2010 09:18, Mike Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz wrote:
As promised, and long awaited, the next phase of the OSM License Upgrade has
arrived. Phase 2 - Existing Contributor Voluntary Re-licensing [1] has
begun, and you may indicate your acceptance of the new Contributor Terms for
your
On 12 August 2010 11:01, Matt Williams li...@milliams.com wrote:
On 12 August 2010 09:18, Mike Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz wrote:
As promised, and long awaited, the next phase of the OSM License Upgrade has
arrived. Phase 2 - Existing Contributor Voluntary Re-licensing [1] has
begun, and you
What can I do I agree to relicense my stuff under ODbL, but I can't
agree with CT Section 3? I hoped LWG will think about removing it, but
it seems that relicensing is already started without investigating
complain about section 3.
Cheers,
Peter.
___
On 12 August 2010 11:18, Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.com wrote:
What can I do I agree to relicense my stuff under ODbL, but I can't
agree with CT Section 3? I hoped LWG will think about removing it, but
it seems that relicensing is already started without investigating
complain about
Thanks,
So we have clarified my question. (2 responses on the main talk list
and some IRC chat), but because of the bulk messages, it might have
gotten lost)
It is clear that there are 2 separate questions being asked.
The 1st part is a 'yes i agree' only answer ... which is fine. In
order to
On 12/08/2010 09:18, Mike Collinson wrote:
As promised, and long awaited, the next phase of the OSM License
Upgrade has arrived. Phase 2...
Am I going blind? I can see no 'decline' button, only 'accept'.
Obviously users can just close the page, but that doesn't give a clear
representation
[Apologies for continuing cross-post, please follow-up to OSM legal-talk.]
Sam Vekemans wrote:
So my question is weather or not, at a later date, I
can change my choice (based on new information which would want me to
change my mind).?
As a general point, if you declare that something is
On 12 August 2010 11:39, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 12/08/2010 09:18, Mike Collinson wrote:
As promised, and long awaited, the next phase of the OSM License Upgrade
has arrived. Phase 2...
Am I going blind? I can see no 'decline' button, only 'accept'.
Obviously users can
On 12 August 2010 11:18, Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.com wrote:
What can I do I agree to relicense my stuff under ODbL, but I can't
agree with CT Section 3? I hoped LWG will think about removing it, but
it seems that relicensing is already started without investigating
complain about
On 12 August 2010 11:58, Markus marku...@bigpond.com wrote:
On 12 August 2010 11:18, Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.com wrote:
What can I do I agree to relicense my stuff under ODbL, but I can't
agree with CT Section 3? I hoped LWG will think about removing it, but
it seems that relicensing
Thread closed:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
[Apologies for continuing cross-post, please follow-up to OSM legal-talk.]
Sam Vekemans wrote:
So my question is weather or not, at a later date, I
can change my choice (based on new information
To all contributors.
I'm sorry to have to urge you to not agree to the CT terms, but please
consider the points below. Please note that this is not a question of
whether ODBL is the right way to proceed, but is merely comments on the
current contributor terms which you are being asked to
I really want to be able to click 'Agree' and 'make it PD' but section
1 worries me as it states that I agree to only add Contents for which
[I am] the copyright holder. This seems to preclude me being able to
add any data I've imported from an outside source (like tracing from
OS Street
In the specific case of the OSM database, if you wanted to start doing
this, you would probably need to establish a per-object licensing flag. This
would require significant code changes and I assume you're not volunteering
to do that.
We can assume that user won't change his/her mind too
On 12 August 2010 21:06, Sam Vekemans acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, I have 2 accounts and can easily make the preference clear in
my user profile description.
Will there be a process to transfer ownership of a changeset between
accounts if data is submitted under the wrong
On 12 August 2010 21:52, MP singular...@gmail.com wrote:
In the specific case of the OSM database, if you wanted to start doing
this, you would probably need to establish a per-object licensing flag. This
would require significant code changes and I assume you're not volunteering
to do that.
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Nick Hocking wrote:
It seems as though if someone ran a bot to add just one tag to most of the
streets in (say) Canberra
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Grant Slater wrote:
There is also a plan of action if people are found to be making these
sorts of abusive edits.
I can
Peter,
Do you know what will happen if I do not agree with the CT permanently?
Cheers,
Julio Costa
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 4:39 AM, Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de wrote:
Am 12.08.2010 10:18, schrieb Martin Fossdal Guttesen:
i followed the link under my settings
i can’t find either
On 12/08/10 13:58, Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote:
PS: I'd be interested to know if the current CTs have had any legal
review from OSMF's lawyers...
Who do you think wrote them?!? Normal humans don't write like that!
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
Julio,
Julio Costa Zambelli wrote:
Do you know what will happen if I do not agree with the CT permanently?
In the long run there will be generally no room in OSM for data which
has not been added under CT.
It is possible for OSMF to make exceptions for individual cases, e.g. if
you have
On 12/08/10 12:51, Brian Quinion wrote:
Could you point to the document from OS that gives explicit
permission? I would love to find such a document.
It's here:
http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/opendata/licence/docs/licence.pdf
Unfortunately it does not, as far as I can see,
On 12 August 2010 14:37, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
On 12/08/10 12:51, Brian Quinion wrote:
Could you point to the document from OS that gives explicit
permission? I would love to find such a document.
It's here:
Tom Hughes wrote:
Which is clearly in conflict with the CTs which require you to
grant OSMF a license to sublicense any data you upload under
a license of their choosing subject only to a constraint that
the license they choose is open and free which clearly does
not restrict their
Thank you Frederik.
That is our exact case. All of the suburban highways data was imported
with two personal accounts (long time ago, with no knowledge of the
best practices for those kind of processes).
Do you know who will be managing this inside the Foundation?
Best Regards,
Julio Costa
On
Pierre-Alain Dorange wrote:
How data in my village disappeared ?
We've used totally legal sources compatible with OSM.
I'm one of the most quantity data creator (in my town) and i realesed
all my adds/modification as PD...
If any of the other people who mapped your village don't agree to
I was just trying to figure out why a lake I traced last night hadn't
been rendered yet. After double checking tagging, relationing, etc I
finally looked at munin[1] and noticed that yevaud stopped getting
diffs almost 10 hours ago. Also, looking at the OWL status page[2], it
isn't getting diffs
Not sure whats wrong but a couple of streams I mapped 4-5 hours ago
are not rendering as yet.
Shalabh
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
I was just trying to figure out why a lake I traced last night hadn't
been rendered yet. After double checking
On Thursday 12 August 2010 13:45:49 David Groom wrote:
1) The last sentence of clause (1) of the contributor terms requires YOU
to have EXPLICIT permission from the rights holder. Please consider if you
have this EXPLICIT permission, if you do not have it then you CAN NOT
agree to the
On 12 August 2010 17:29, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
I was just trying to figure out why a lake I traced last night hadn't
been rendered yet. After double checking tagging, relationing, etc I
finally looked at munin[1] and noticed that yevaud stopped getting
diffs almost 10 hours
Yes, nothing mapped within the last 10 hours has been rendered.
Although the munin graph just started taking a nosedive so someone
must have kicked something just now. I'm guessing it will take an hour
or two more for everything to catch up though.
Toby
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Shalabh
Yay! My lake is in the process of being rendered right now. Thanks for
greasing the gears!
Toby
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Grant Slater
openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
On 12 August 2010 17:29, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
I was just trying to figure out why a lake I
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
Yay! My lake is in the process of being rendered right now. Thanks for
greasing the gears!
Toby
Lucky you, I cant see the fruit of my labours yet. Patience is the
greatest virtue!
Shalabh
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at
Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Yahoo aerial imagery is supplied under some terms (sorry too lazy to look them
up right now). Sometime in the past someone(s) from within the OSM project
asked them if tracing from those images to make a map was possible within
those terms. They answered:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Julio,
Julio Costa Zambelli wrote:
Do you know what will happen if I do not agree with the CT permanently?
In the long run there will be generally no room in OSM for data which has
not been added under CT.
This
80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
That said, the strategy adopted by OSFM is one that is calculated to load
the bases in favour of enabling them to switch to ODbL eventually. They do
not intend to ask the whole community to vote on whether there should be a
switch. This is a sign of their
Please, if there's anything that you don't like, just ignore it, take your
GPS go for walk/ride/journey.
It really is that simple.
Dave F.
+1
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Pierre-Alain Dorange wrote:
[...]
That said, the strategy adopted by OSFM is one that is calculated to load
the bases in favour of enabling them to switch to ODbL eventually. They
do not intend to ask the whole community to vote on whether there should
be a switch.
Am 12.08.2010 22:17, schrieb Pierre-Alain Dorange:
80n80n...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
That said, the strategy adopted by OSFM is one that is calculated to load
the bases in favour of enabling them to switch to ODbL eventually. They do
not intend to ask the whole community to vote on whether
- Original Message -
From: Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Cc: legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 5:52 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Voluntary re-licensing begins
On Thursday 12 August 2010 13:45:49 David Groom wrote:
1) The last
Grant Slater wrote:
There were networking problem around 8:45am (BST) with planet.osm.org,
this seems to have cause osmosis --read-replication-interval to
lock.
My replication script got also stuck. I wish someone could implement a
timeout so after receiving no data for a certain time it
On 13/08/2010, at 8:17, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net wrote:
Firstly, as you say sometime in the past. So Yahoo gave permission when
the project has a CC-BY-SA licence. The contributor terms allow the
switching of the licence to a non-CC-BY-SA licence. So how can I possibly
- Original Message -
From: Simon Biber simonbi...@yahoo.com.au
To: David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 12:33 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Voluntary re-licensing begins
On 13/08/2010, at 8:17, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net
Hi,
I'll be brief:
1) License change good. Me happy with license change.
2) Check box (In addition to the above agreement, I consider my
contributions to be in the Public Domain) bad. Easy to tick without
reading. Looks like standard I have read, I agree.
Steve
Hi all,
Wondering if anyone knows the current status of OpenCycleMap tile
generation. Any idea when I could expect an update in my neck of the
woods (Melbourne, Australia)?
Steve
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 11:47 +1000, Steve Bennett wrote:
Hi all,
Wondering if anyone knows the current status of OpenCycleMap tile
generation. Any idea when I could expect an update in my neck of the
woods (Melbourne, Australia)?
Steve
Andy tweeted yesterday that his new server just
Great, I'll keep an eye out.
Steve
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Adam Killian vi...@bonius.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 11:47 +1000, Steve Bennett wrote:
Hi all,
Wondering if anyone knows the current status of OpenCycleMap tile
generation. Any idea when I could expect an update in
Great post, and excellent honeytrap: all the poisonous people flocked
immediately to this thread and started debating it furiously.
Some points:
- verbosity/spamminess *is* disruptive. It takes a lot of time to
read, and invariably someone will respond, causing more posts. Worse,
it causes
On Wednesday 11 August 2010 09:45:54 Foppe Benedictus wrote:
Oi oi,
mag ik dan ook wensen dat er een pagina komt voor de wandelnetwerken? Ik
weet eigenlijk niet hoeveel daarvan is, maar in Twente hebben we er 1 in
ieder geval ;), deze hebben neem ik aan dezelfde tagging schema als de
2010/8/11 Lennardl...@xs4all.nl:
even iets anders; zullen we de knooppuntennetwerken qua naam op lijn
zetten? Op dit moment zijn er grofweg 4 vormen: FRN, Fietsroutenetwerk,
Wat mij betreft doen we alleen de naam, zonder al die voorvoegsels. De
tagging geeft al aan wat het is, en zelf heb ik
On 12-08-10 08:18, Freek wrote:
On Wednesday 11 August 2010 09:45:54 Foppe Benedictus wrote:
Oi oi,
mag ik dan ook wensen dat er een pagina komt voor de wandelnetwerken? Ik
weet eigenlijk niet hoeveel daarvan is, maar in Twente hebben we er 1 in
ieder geval ;), deze hebben neem ik aan
Excuus dat ik niet in 1 keer volledig kan reageren
On 12-08-10 08:18, Freek wrote:
On Wednesday 11 August 2010 09:45:54 Foppe Benedictus wrote:
Oi oi,
mag ik dan ook wensen dat er een pagina komt voor de wandelnetwerken? Ik
weet eigenlijk niet hoeveel daarvan is, maar in Twente hebben we
Ik zie dat het tagging schema anders is, lijkt me ongewenst. Ik heb in
Twente wel het schema van de fietsnetwerken als leidraad genomen, deze
lijkt mij voordelen te hebben boven het oude.
Wat je daar ziet is het oude taggingschema, zoals het eerst ook voor de
fietsknooppunten was. Het nieuwe
On 12-08-10 09:36, Lennard wrote:
Ik zie dat het tagging schema anders is, lijkt me ongewenst. Ik heb in
Twente wel het schema van de fietsnetwerken als leidraad genomen, deze
lijkt mij voordelen te hebben boven het oude.
Wat je daar ziet is het oude taggingschema, zoals het eerst ook
En nu dus ook in Rotterdam !! Name = Rotterdam RCN 33
Zo je mijn hint in een vorig bericht nog niet begrepen had: waarom
hiervoor geen note=* gebruiken? Dat zou in 1 klap deze hele discussie
overbodig kunnen maken. Zeker als die fix in JOSM die ik eerder liet zien,
geïmplementeerd zou zijn.
On 12-08-10 09:36, Lennard wrote:
Tijd voor een wiki update dus :)
De twee redenen dat ik het zelf nog niet gedaan had, hebben te maken met
de acceptatie van het schema voor fietsknooppuntennetwerken ten eerste, en
de iets afwijkende situatie in Twente als tweede. Hoe kunnen we die
variant
Op de knooppunten zelf staat in NL meestal geen bord met het nummer van het
knooppunt, of zelfs nooit? Dus in jouw theorie zou je dat nummer ook niet
kunnen mappen in een samengestelde name=* ? :-)
Hoeveel fotos met nummer wil je ? Ik hel elk knooppunt gefotografeerd.
In haaglanden, Rotterdam
On Thursday 12 August 2010 05:39:04 ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert
Gremmen wrote:
Staat in koeieletters op het bord. Bord is fysiek, en heeft een
geofunctie.
En een naam.
Ga jij ook al die blauwe borden aan het begin van de bebouwde kom mappen met
place=... en name=Roterdam/Delft/...
zouden willen. Op de knooppunten zelf staat in NL meestal geen bord met
het nummer van het knooppunt, of zelfs nooit? Dus in jouw theorie zou je
dat nummer ook niet kunnen mappen in een samengestelde name=* ? :-)
In mijn ervaring in Limburg staan die borden er (op een hoogst enkele
Hoeveel fotos met nummer wil je ? Ik hel elk knooppunt gefotografeerd.
In haaglanden, Rotterdam en Midden-Delfland hebben ze allemaal een eigen
nummer erop.
Dan zwak ik mijn bewering af. In mijn omgeving hebben de knooppunten zelf
alleen maar de nummers van de te bereiken punten erop, maar
Goed idee, stond al op de agenda.
Ik dacht ook aan een verkeersbordenproject, een lantaarnpalen project
en een rioolputdekselproject. Kunnen we koppelen aan de
openrioolkaart.nl
Regards,
Gert Gremmen
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: talk-nl-boun...@openstreetmap.org
De knooppuntnodes zou je op deze manier kunnen toevoegen aan de
routerelatie. Routerelaties uit het hart van het netwerk zou je op de gok
kunnen toevoegen aan de netwerkrelatie, maar aan de rand van het netwerk
is dat allemaal niet zo simpel als het lijkt. Zit Midden-Delfland ook zo
raar verweven
ja, bovendien zijn een flink aantal knooppunten van eigenaar veranderd..
Gelukkig zaten ze nog niet in een relatie ;).
Het geeft je weer wat te doen. Wat is de reden van de overdracht? Kunnen
de betrokken organisatie geen bruikbaar overzicht leveren aan
geïnteresseerde, hergebruikende burgers?
Ah gelukkig ben ik niet de enige die putdeksels boeiend vind ;)
Rob
Op 12 augustus 2010 12:35 heeft ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert
Gremmen g.grem...@cetest.nl het volgende geschreven:
Goed idee, stond al op de agenda.
Ik dacht ook aan een verkeersbordenproject, een lantaarnpalen project
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Rob wrote:
Ah gelukkig ben ik niet de enige die putdeksels boeiend vind ;)
Ik snap niet dat jullie beide bij commerciele instellingen werken ;)
ambtenarij had echt wat voor jullie kunnen zijn ;)
Stefan
___
Talk-nl mailing
Beste mensen,
Aangezien Nederlanders in de regel wel Engelse tekst kunnen lezen, heb
ik me even de moeite bespaard om bijgaande tekst te vertalen ;-)
Het komt erop neer: Iedereen kan nu zijn akkoord geven voor de nieuwe
gebruikersovereenkomst (Contributor Terms) mbt de OpenStreetMap
On 12-8-2010 20:43, Henk Hoff wrote:
Beste mensen,
Aangezien Nederlanders in de regel wel Engelse tekst kunnen lezen, heb
ik me even de moeite bespaard om bijgaande tekst te vertalen ;-)
Het komt erop neer: Iedereen kan nu zijn akkoord geven voor de nieuwe
gebruikersovereenkomst (Contributor
News today from Mike Collinson, Chair of the OSMF License Working Group:
As promised, and long awaited, the next phase of the OSM License
Upgrade has arrived. Phase 2 - Existing Contributor Voluntary
Re-licensing [1] has begun, and you may indicate your acceptance of
the new Contributor Terms
I haven't read all the posts regarding this matter so maybe I have missed
some clarifications but
It seems as though if someone ran a bot to add just one tag to most of the
streets in (say) Canberra and then failed to
agree to a re-licence, then all those streets in Canberra would be thrown
Its really disappointing that the introductory paragraph which says Please
read the agreement below and press the agree button to confirm that you accept
the terms of this agreement for your existing and future contributions. does
not containing any warning that if you have used any source
On 12 August 2010 12:28, Nick Hocking nick.hock...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems as though if someone ran a bot to add just one tag to most of the
streets in (say) Canberra and then failed to
agree to a re-licence, then all those streets in Canberra would be thrown
away in their entirety (or
On 12 August 2010 21:28, Nick Hocking nick.hock...@gmail.com wrote:
Have I got this right or am I worrying too much?
It's unclear what will happen at this point, since no one has the
chance to actually disagree any more, although there was a thread
about what to do about people that aren't
Thankfully worrying too much.
We have the full history of all changes, his edits would not be
carried across (unwound) but the existing data if approved for ODbL
would be carried across.
There is also a plan of action if people are found to be making these
sorts of abusive edits.
There is a full
On 12 August 2010 13:05, Nick Hocking nick.hock...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok - just to clarify.
If I've edited a road then the bot does it's thing and then I make further
improvements,
the bots effect can be automatically removed without losing either of my
edits.
I don't know the details yet,
Nearmap as far as I know haven't agreed to the new Contributor Terms
(CTs) or the ODBL, so anyone that has traced anything from Nearmap
isn't able to agree to the new license, doing so would put you in
breach of contract with Nearmap which would also breach clause 1 on
the new Contributor Terms.
I'd just like to mention that we have our lawyers looking at the CTs and the
licences (in fact I was in a long meeting about that just yesterday) and
we'll be responding to the LWG shortly. After that I hope we'll be able to
make our position clear on the mailing lists.
Regards
Ben
--
Ben Last
Entendi. Funcionou!
Muito obrigado
Abraço
2010/8/12 Bráulio Bezerra da Silva brauliobeze...@gmail.com
Você pode tomar como exemplo as divisas entre municípios. Cada fronteira
entre duas cidades é um caminho. E cada cidade tem uma relação que utiliza
as respectivas fronteiras. A única coisa
Am 10.08.2010 09:22, schrieb Jacques Nietsch:
Hallo,
wenn man Tracks hochlädt, findet man im Web (z.B.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Jacques_N/traces/765574)
hübsche animierte Gifs.
Mit welchem Tool sind die gemacht? Wo kann man das Tool bekommen?
Weiß das jemand?
Der Ruby-Code der diese
Sven Geggus wrote:
Wir sollten das Ganze also ins Wiki und in diverser Renderer
einbauen.
Steht schon auf der Todo-Liste für die Wanderkarte.
bye
Nop
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Lastenseilbahn-Auf-ein-Neues-tp5413956p5415265.html
Sent
Hi !
ich habe gerade nochmal gebastelt und jetzt werden meine Tracks und
POI's angezeigt - bei den Tracks sogar die PopUps der Tracks. Da war
beim Zusammenkopieren der Funktionen eine Datei auf der Strecke geblieben !
http://www.tappenbeck.net/osm/maps/deu/index_new.php?id=8000
Falls es Dir
gruß Jan :-)
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
1 - 100 of 292 matches
Mail list logo
