灯台ですね?
海の方には、重要ですね。日本は、うみに囲まれているだけ有り、
沢山の港と灯台やソレに類する設備が有りますね。
ご興味の有る方、ぜひ名乗り出ていただいて、Markusさんと
よくしていけるといいですね。
是非、海沿いに住んでいる方、地元のチェックを。
On 2012年12月06日 22:51, Markus wrote:
In Japan there are a lot of ports
with a lot of lighthouses and other nautical lights.
Please can you help, to move them to
ikiyaです。
私もバス狙いですが、やはり連休で混むせいか
良いバス?(楽ちんタイプ)は予約が詰まってきてる感があります。
予約はお早めに。
--- On Thu, 2012/12/13, Hiroshi Miura(@osmf) miur...@osmf.jp wrote:
三浦@OSMFJです。
On 2012年12月10日 13:25, Tomomichi Hayakawa wrote:
1/13にOSMワークショップ名古屋#5 を開催いたします。
・更に、今回は、当日、OSMFJ総会を行う予定でいますので、
OSMFJの方も多く参加されると思います。
早川です。
遠方の方、ご足労をお掛けいたしますが、
1/13(日)の午前中という事で、進めたいと思います。
【OSMFJ 総会】
・日時: 1月13日(日) 10:00〜12:00
・場所: 名古屋工業大学19号館202教室
尚、当日の早朝、名古屋に到着する方も多そうですので、
私の研究室で、休憩とか可能な様に、調整してみます。
(数人であれば可能ですので)
告知とか、どうすれば良かったでしょうか?
昨年、どうしましたでしょうか?
2012年12月13日 11:10 ikiya insidekiwi...@yahoo.co.jp:
ikiyaです。
ごめんなさい、レス間違えました。
OSMワークショップ名古屋#5 の話でしたね。
勘違いしていました。
先のメールは無視してください。
2012年12月13日 11:35 Tomomichi Hayakawa tom.hayak...@gmail.com:
早川です。
遠方の方、ご足労をお掛けいたしますが、
1/13(日)の午前中という事で、進めたいと思います。
【OSMFJ 総会】
・日時: 1月13日(日) 10:00〜12:00
・場所: 名古屋工業大学19号館202教室
尚、当日の早朝、名古屋に到着する方も多そうですので、
ikiyaです。
毎年、年を越す頃、その年のGPSログは何本とったかなとか見返したりしています。
そこで新年を迎えるにあたって
来年はGPSログ何本、POIを何個登録するかとか建物をいくつ書くかとか目標を
宣言してマッピングするのもいいなと考えました。
個人個人のマッピングスタイル、マッピングの量、ペースはそれぞれ違うので
宣言した内容についての進捗率%を比較公開して楽しめればと思います。
達成率が悪くてもそれはそれで反省にもなりますし、自分がどのくらい
地図書きしているかその編集量を知るのも楽しいと思います。
パスカルさんのサイトや
“How did you contribute
Jason Cunningham wrote:
(just noticed my work on the South Devon Link Road and surrounding area has been
deleted, then the same info re-added by someone else! I've been cleansed from
the history.)
This is the more 'irritating' bit here. People spending a substantial amount of
time doing work
Just spotted all the activity on this thread which is great to see.
Personally I am reasonably neutral on what policy emerges from this
conversation.
I do agree that few schemes are really really certain until the diggers
arrive. By way of example, I personally removed the Longdendale bypass (
Sounds good. Do however check out the code Thomas Wood wrote for a complete
NaPTAN importer a long time back.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NaPTAN/Import
Regards,
Peter
On 11 December 2012 21:55, Barry Cornelius barrycorneliu...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012, Donald Noble wrote:
Try to find new audiences, this mailing list is saturated with your target
market already. So, try google ads or a banner on osm.org. Work with existing
local groups (e.g. the seattle group had no real heads up about at least 2 out
of the 3 meetings).
On Dec 11, 2012, at 10:46 PM, Martijn van
From: Steve Coast [mailto:st...@asklater.com]
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Mappy Hour suggestions?
Try to find new audiences, this mailing list is saturated with your
target market already. So, try google ads or a banner on osm.org. Work
with existing local groups (e.g. the seattle group had no
Hello Everybody,
I would like to kick off the MassGIS building import. This following is
copy/paste from the current wiki (
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/MassGIS_Buildings_Import). The external
links will work on the wiki.
--
On Dec, 2012 MassGIS
A couple of initial comments:
Has some kind of simplify been run on the data? Although most of the
buildings are quite good some of the curved ones are overnoded (e.g.
http://took.paulnorman.ca/imports/massgis/noded.png)
If your documentation conflicts with the requirements of the import
Paul - can you elaborate on the point about users being blocked if not
using a dedicated account?
The guidelines don't point this out it seems contrary to the spirit of
there being no right way of doing things in OSM. (Not a policy I agree
with, but que sera...).
Who does the blocking?
Thanks,
In regards to this and previous imports, I have found that this is by no
means the law when it comes to imports. In Canada we have / and still are
in the lengthy process of importing canvec data for the whole country. We
do this in a distributed approach. Each user can upload the data with their
Imports which don't follow the guidelines may be asked to stop or blocked.
This includes imports where the appropriate community consultation wasn't
done, imports with legal problems, imports without a dedicated account, and
various weird problems.
Most cases are dealt with via a private
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 7:15 PM, nicholas ingalls
nicholas.inga...@gmail.com wrote:
In regards to this and previous imports, I have found that this is by no
means the law when it comes to imports. In Canada we have / and still are
in the lengthy process of importing canvec data for the whole
IMO, the process by which blocks are placed, who does the asking of the
user to follow the guidelines, and those with authority to block users
needs to be documented and reviewed. If it already is, please provide a
pointer. Strikes me as fairly ominous and potentially arbitrary.
Can anyone point
CanVec operates with each user using a dedicated account. Using a dedicated
account doesn't mean sharing an account.
From: Clifford Snow [mailto:cliff...@snowandsnow.us]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 8:37 PM
To: nicholas ingalls
Cc: OpenStreetMap US Talk
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] [Imports]
http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group
From: Jeff Meyer [mailto:j...@gwhat.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 9:47 PM
To: Paul Norman
Cc: impo...@openstreetmap.org; OpenStreetMap US Talk
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] MassGIS Building Import Start
IMO, the process by
Paul - thanks for the link! I'll send a separate note to the DWG with my
concerns. - Jeff
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group
** **
*From:* Jeff Meyer [mailto:j...@gwhat.org]
*Sent:* Wednesday,
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Jeff Meyer j...@gwhat.org wrote:
IMO, the process by which blocks are placed, who does the asking of the user
to follow the guidelines, and those with authority to block users needs to
be documented and reviewed. If it already is, please provide a pointer.
101 - 121 of 121 matches
Mail list logo