Re: [OSM-talk-be] IBPT antennas

2020-03-09 Thread rodeo .be
Hello Vucodil fantastic news from the BIPT. I would advise you to ask the BIPT to share the list as well on the federal government open data portal . It is only a small step for them now (they already approved us using the data). I see some advantages in that: it will

Re: [OSM-talk-be] IBPT antennas

2020-03-09 Thread Pieter Vander Vennet
Maybe "ref:BE:BIPT=", "operator=Proximux" and "ref:operator=", this makes eventual retagging a breeze when someone renames On 09.03.20 11:39, Lionel Giard wrote: > Cool news that they gave the authorization to use it ! And it is > always great to have some interest on the telecom side.

Re: [OSM-talk-be] IBPT antennas

2020-03-09 Thread Lionel Giard
Cool news that they gave the authorization to use it ! And it is always great to have some interest on the telecom side. :D I'll give what i know and some opinion on the tagging. ^_^ For the tags to use, there was a (rather long) discussion in October 2018 on Tagging mailing list (

Re: [OSM-talk-be] IBPT antennas

2020-03-08 Thread Midgard
Replying inline to s8evq and Karel: Quoting s8evq (2020-03-08 20:20:34) > What is the point of adding longitude=* and latitude=* to the nodes? I had overlooked them, but these tags definitely have to be dropped. > How precise are the locations of the antennas in the BIPT dataset? Do we know >

Re: [OSM-talk-be] IBPT antennas

2020-03-08 Thread s8evq
What is the point of adding longitude=* and latitude=* to the nodes? How precise are the locations of the antennas in the BIPT dataset? Do we know what the quality of this data is before importing? I agree that the data should be kept up to date through a script. If you don't keep it

Re: [OSM-talk-be] IBPT antennas

2020-03-08 Thread Karel Adams
Over de talenkwestie zeg ik maar niet teveel, enkel een "bravo" voor de oproep tot objectiviteit. Maar inhoudelijk heb ik wel zo mijn vragen: wij mappen toch "in principe" enkel dingen die zichtbaar zijn in het landschap? Die antennes van BIPT die hangen toch meestal op bestaande

Re: [OSM-talk-be] IBPT antennas

2020-03-08 Thread Thibault Rommel
Hello there Small detail, I believe it makes more sense to use the abbreviation BIPT instead of IBPT, since it is "Belgian Institute for Postal services and Telecommunications" in English and both Dutch and German also have BIPT as the abbreviation. -- Thibault Op zo 8 mrt. 2020 om 14:16

Re: [OSM-talk-be] IBPT antennas

2020-03-08 Thread Pieter Vander Vennet
Hey, Supercool initiative! Unfortunately, I do not have enough time to help out with everything, but you have my support to add those to OSM as well - it will be a big added value. Kind regards, Pietervdvn On 08.03.20 15:34, Midgard wrote: > Cool news! > > 1) Instead of doing it once, wouldn't

Re: [OSM-talk-be] IBPT antennas

2020-03-08 Thread Midgard
Cool news! 1) Instead of doing it once, wouldn't it be nicer to keep it updated? Generating a list of changes between two versions of the source file would be trivial. 2) Three meters is way, way, way too little. I opened the data and looked at literally the first antenna I saw in OSM,

[OSM-talk-be] IBPT antennas

2020-03-08 Thread Vucodil via Talk-be
Hello everyone, Recently, we got the permission from ibpt.be to use their data in OpenStreetMap: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/ibpt_belgium_antennas This includes all the antennas (more than 9000) managed by the three operators (Proximus, Mobistar and Telenet) with the