On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Glenn Plas wrote:
> These are question you will encounter in cities with historical buildings.
My pleasure to give you those problems :-)
A related problem is the case where only 1 building of a group is
protected, e.g. only one barn or the building for the pro
I meant: show building=industrial and building=house differently
And also, I follow the same principles as Sander does. If I know the
entrance, I map the address. I also discovered that mapping the address
on the house + on an entrance node doesn't harm either.
Specifically when a house got a ce
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Glenn Plas wrote:
> When sure it is a house, map it building=house.
>
> I started doing this as well lately, I'm trying to get away from
> building=yes
>
> usually garage , house , residential (for big living blocks) , shed ,
> industrial.
>
>
+1, please try to be
When sure it is a house, map it building=house.
I started doing this as well lately, I'm trying to get away from
building=yes
usually garage , house , residential (for big living blocks) , shed ,
industrial.
Those probably make up for 99% of the building keys I create.
The default map style she
Our postbox stands about 10m from our house, and about 20m from our main
entrance. Though we only use our main entrance once or twice per week, so
it's hardly our main entrance. And there's no way you can find our entrance
without coming in our front-yard.
So I prefer to add a housenumber to the i
My preference is mapping a house or building as 'yes', and then place a
node with the address number and street in the building/house as close
nearby to the 'main' entrance, because that is usually the place where
the postbox also is. Or is that wrong ?
Also, when a building has a 'strange', and
