Hey all,
> Hello,
>
> Le 15.06.20 à 08:23, Sander Deryckere a écrit :
> > https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/50.87528/4.69102
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499694374
> this look like a mistake :
> wiki : marking range of numbers of flats behind a door,
> but the object isn't a door,
Sander,
I absolutely agree with this!
However, as much as I am a fan of CRAB, I don't really trust the
subaddresses. They caused me way too many headaches when I still worked in
the city of Antwerp. Anecdotally, I've surveyed one building for
subaddresses near me, and there was zero correlation
You can do things with that data besides rendering or using it as a route
location.
If the data is more or less complete, you can process it to get the number
of addresses on a street or in an area (for example, if you want to
distribute a folder to the entire street).
Or as a postal service, you
if one building have 2 entrance, it's useful to describe with entrance
need to be used to reach this flats number.
but having all flats number on the building or on one-only entrance,
is like "to reach the inside of the building, reach the building".
it's a bit like adding entrance=yes on the
The tagging is correct, it is just not supposed to be on area from the wiki
perspective. But indeed I don't see why it is incorrect when a building is
only containing this series of flats and only one entrance ? And if that's
incorrect why are they rendering addr:flats on area and not node ?! ^^'
Most of this data comes from the GRB import, I would guess. So it comes
from CRAB. We use the addr:flats to map the "subaddresses".
It seems a little weird to not be able to add the subaddresses on the same
object that has the main address.
The CRAB import tool mentioned this as an optional tag,
Hmm,
it seems indeed that, according to the wiki, this should not be placed on
areas.
However, I expect that in all these cases, all flats are accessible behind
the same door.
So correcting the tag will have the same effect.
Op ma 15 jun. 2020 om 09:12 schreef Marc M. :
> Hello,
>
> Le 15.06.20
Hello,
Le 15.06.20 à 08:23, Sander Deryckere a écrit :
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/50.87528/4.69102
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499694374
this look like a mistake :
wiki : marking range of numbers of flats behind a door,
but the object isn't a door, it's a building
maybe
Hi,
In December last year, the default map rendering started to display the
addr:flats tag.
In Belgium, this looks rather ugly as these tags can be very long.
In some cases, it even becomes hard to see the housenumbers.
See some examples:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/50.87528/4.69102
