The problem is - whenever you try and get changes for the renderer - the
argument is they don't feel they should change the renderer to try and
influence the tagging. They care about rendering 'the tags that actively
get used'.
Be very carefull how you pitch the argument, or it'll instantly get a
Le 23. 02. 18 à 07:44, Karel Adams a écrit :
> Whence my repeated question: where or with whom can this be discussed?
the tagging mailing for the schema
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
github to use a current schema
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/
Glenn, hebt ge me wel goed gelezen?
There is not the slightest need to convince me we should not map for the
renderer. There's a bunch of mappers, especially in France but also one
in Italy, who vehemently remove the "aeroway=aerodrome" tag from small
airfields. When I reinstate it, they will
HEllo,
Since the rendering is aware of the problem and its answer is "there's a
schema missing able to be used." :
- make a fork of rendering is useless if the data does not exist
- it is enough to make a proposed feature to fill the gap.
Regard,
Marc
Le 22. 02. 18 à 10:41, Glenn Plas a écrit
Mapping for the renderer is de facto wrong and what you experience now
(in france etc.) is the endresult of that attitude. I don't understand
why you get discouraged on OSM because of a map you don't like. It's
like saying: "I don't contribute to Wikipedia anymore because when I
print a page
to avoid the egg and chicken problem,
I think it's best to work on both ends.
1) work on a taginfo proposal to distinguish between a large airport and
a small one. it can be based on the proposal I mentioned earlier. or
based on some of the existing tags your are talking about. it can also
go
Marc, thanks for the reply. Only the arguments (not yours! I will not
shoot at the messenger! at the contrary!) do not hold true. Several
hundred minor fields have been tagged with either "aeroway:airstrip" or
("aeroway:aerodrome" AND "aerodrome:airstrip"). The first are not
rendered at all,
Hello,
Le 19. 01. 18 à 16:43, Karel Adams a écrit :
> distinct symbols for (bigger) airports,
> (smaller) airfields, and glider fields
I found this old propal.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Aerodrome
I like importance=international/national/regional like for railway.
I don't know for sure, but the rendering on openstreetmap.org is called
OpenStreetMap Carto and to request improvement I think you file a bug report on
their github. [1] See also [2] and notice the brief "Reporting Issues" guidance
mentions providing a screenshot and a link. [2]
[1]
When I first consulted maps - paper-only, at that time, of course - the
famous Michelin 1:20 had distinct symbols for (bigger) airports,
(smaller) airfields, and glider fields. As of 2018, the generic map of
openstreetmap has only a single icon to represent anything mapped with
10 matches
Mail list logo
