It's not just this mailing list. Go to openstreetmap.org and try to find a
page in Dutch (for the Belgian community -- besides how to map a). Or even
try to subscribe to this mailing list without any knowledge of English.
I'm thinking of a whole category of retired people, that love to walk,
bike,
It would never have occurred to me to write a personal message to this
obviously Flemish user in English. As far as the mailing list goes, as far
as I'm concerned anyone can write messages in French or Dutch as well.
Especially if the contents only concern one part of the country.
Het zou nooit bi
... They should forbid people to edit with potlatch...
They = the openstreetmap police ? ;-)
Vrees dat het niet enkel van Potlatch afhangt of mappers al dan niet fouten
maken
Georges
2013/6/24 Glenn Plas
> I really tried but he sure pissed me off. I fixed everything he did
> wrong, he's thi
Ivo, ik geef je gelijk dat we sommige mappers afschrikken door alle/veel
communicatie in het Engels te doen.
I'll agree that we might scare away some (potential) mappers by doing most
communication in English.
m
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Ivo De Broeck wrote:
> Misschien een andere taal
For "bomputten" one could use historic=bomb_crater, but only when it has
some historic value (e.g. when it's marked with an information board).
I'm still under the impression that historic=battlefield is not meant for
each individual bunker or bomb. The typical example in Belgium would be
Waterlo
There are also a lot of those tags around Bonheiden -
Rijmenam - Keerbergen:
http://geschichtskarten.openstreetmap.de/historische_objekte/?zoom=13&lat=51.00577&lon=4.56379&layers=BFT
concerning these, I think this user is correct, that's the area I grew
up in a
Indeed, I aggree. Dropping the amenity would probably be enough I think.
If you take it a step further, I don't even see where amenity is allowed
on a relation checking the wiki (bear in mind I made 2 of those myself
which I'm reconsidering right now)
So stricto senso, it's not allowed, furth
I really tried but he sure pissed me off. I fixed everything he did
wrong, he's thinking: Hey, it's a military cemetary (it is ...) so lets
add a node smack in the middle and call it: historic=battlefield. He
uses amenity=kindergarten to mark leisure=playground.
He also deleted information o
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 09:37:46PM +0200, Marc Gemis wrote:
> I'm interested in the usage of historic=battlefield.
>
> I saw that someone added this to e.g. to a cemetery in Eppegem (Zemst)
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/2308368137
>
> There are also a lot of those tags around Bonheid
Misschien een andere taal gebruiken, bv nederlands ;-)
2013/6/24 Jo
> Please be gentle when explaining him where he goes wrong :-) We need all
> the fresh blood, I mean mappers we can get...
>
> Jo
>
> 2013/6/24 Glenn Plas
>
>> The Eppegem cemetary is like 1200 meters from my doorstep, I neve
Please be gentle when explaining him where he goes wrong :-) We need all
the fresh blood, I mean mappers we can get...
Jo
2013/6/24 Glenn Plas
> The Eppegem cemetary is like 1200 meters from my doorstep, I never saw a
> battlefield reference on the cemetary. Whats worse is , in his other edit
The Eppegem cemetary is like 1200 meters from my doorstep, I never saw a
battlefield reference on the cemetary. Whats worse is , in his other
edits he's adding parking space where I've already done all the parking
space around. user has 5 edits on his name:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/
I looked at his other edits and I get the impression he's from Switzerland.
Maybe things are done differently there.
Jo
2013/6/24 Marc Gemis
> The wiki clearly describes that the relation=network should be used to
> combine routes (walking, bus, ...) together. see
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.or
I'm interested in the usage of historic=battlefield.
I saw that someone added this to e.g. to a cemetery in Eppegem (Zemst)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/2308368137
There are also a lot of those tags around Bonheiden - Rijmenam - Keerbergen:
http://geschichtskarten.openstreetmap.de/his
The wiki clearly describes that the relation=network should be used to
combine routes (walking, bus, ...) together. see
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Network
This "network" groups together single nodes. That's outside the scope.
>From a database design viewpoint, I understa
Hi,
My french is not that good but isn't this about mapping accessibility
features in trainstations and less about the public transport routing,
multimodal routing or anything related to that?
If you are asking about a project that would be a joint mapping effort i'm
not sure if this is something
Hi everyone,
Been looking at this relation today : 271476 ( see
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/271476 )
It has an amenity set, but these points are widely spread out, I think
this goes against the intended idea behind amenity's.
Any comments ?
Glenn
___
Hi Pieter,
We are interested in all that is geographic, this includes multimodal
routing, so PT is certainly a part of that. (Not so much the schedules
though, that needs to be handeld by the routing engine).
You know I'm working hard on integrating the data of De Lijn and I was
hoping to be able
Hi OSM BE,
In France they are doing this:
http://openstreetmap.fr/partenariat-sncf-transilien
Would it be interesting to do the same things for Belgium? I can get the
one who wants to get it forward in contact with SNCB
Kind regards,
Pieter
___
Talk-b
19 matches
Mail list logo
