On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Manohar Erikipati wrote:
> Hey there,
> Today we mapped 76 turn restrictions in Canada. You can follow the project
> tracker here(https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/213) and get involved.
> We have across signage with text we are not so
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Nathan Wessel
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm hoping to get some advice on what to do with a relatively uncommon turn
> restriction tag currently in use in Toronto and Ottawa.
No right turn on red signs are pretty common. You definitely
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Denis Carriere
wrote:
> If anyone is interested in using this custom imagery in JOSM or iD, here is
> the URL:
>
>
As you are probably aware by now, a large portion of Fort McMurray,
Alberta has been destroyed by forest fires.
Is any freely licensed aerial imagery of the affected area available
yet? Will the Humanitarian OpenStreetMap team be creating a project
for Fort McMurray?
On Feb 28, 2016 3:05 PM, "john whelan" wrote:
>
> It appears in august 2013 user andrewpmk imported the OC transpo bus
stops, which is fine I don't have a problem with imports but I understand
OC transpo issue a new updated GTFS file every year. Are there plans to
reimport
On Jan 12, 2016 2:39 PM, "Mojgan Jadidi" wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks Stewart for initiating this discussion, I am one of the folks
working on OSM data at Metrolinx. We are currently working on OSM data of
our service area to improve the address range information for
On Nov 30, 2015 4:38 PM, "Tristan Anderson"
wrote:
>
> amenity=clinic sounds great. I hope they're not officially called
"urgent care centres" and they certainly shouldn't be tagged as such in
OSM. If I got shot and saw an urgent care centre, I'd probably make the
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Adam Martin wrote:
> There does appear to be a new gap in that area. Perhaps someone is working
> on it in JOSM and is going to be re-making the landuse polygons in the area.
The area around Carleton Place has looked like that for a long
For example Hamilton's open data license
(http://www2.hamilton.ca/NR/rdonlyres/C58984A4-FE11-40B9-A231-8572EB922AAA/0/OpenDataTermsAndConditions_Final.html)
at first glance seems OK:
Your Use of Data: The City of Hamilton grants you a worldwide,
royalty-free, perpetual, non-exclusive licence to
It might be helpful to look at http://openaddresses.io/ which is an
project to aggregate address data from various open data portals.
More and more cities have open data now. In Ontario openaddresses.io lists:
- Burlington
- Guelph
- Hamilton
- Kitchener
- Oakville
- Toronto
- Waterloo
- Welland
I am starting to work on importing Open Data datasets. I am using
pnorman's ogr2osm script with modified translation files (see
https://github.com/andrewpmk/ogr2osm-translations). It will be some
time before I actually import anything.
I would like to assemble a list of government open data
The south end of Highway 11 at the Highway 11/400 junction between
Highway 400 and Penetanguishene Road, just north of Barrie is
currently tagged as Highway 400A in OSM. Is this still Highway 400A? I
thought that this became Highway 11 after the Mike Harris downloading
downloaded the section of
On Jul 6, 2015 9:30 PM, James james2...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd say close them with a comment. Some of them are actually precise,
saying like : no rtor eb. Which is more than enough data. General things
like: add POIs at this location. Could be closed as the entirety of osm
could be summed in a
Recently we have been having a problem with several users doing
mechanical edits to add the prefix ON to the ref of every highway in
Ontario. The Canadian OSM community is unhappy with this.
I admit that I have been guilty of doing inappropriate mechanical
edits in the past, but I am wondering:
A large bounding box of a changeset is not a proof that the edit is
mechanical. There are also users at OSM who first edit an object in
Europe and afterwards in America before they upload their changes. (This
usually happens if the user uses JOSM oder Potlatch 2) On the other
hand, it is
User:osm_validation_and_improvements made mechanical edits to add the
ON prefix to Ontario highways again. I am currently in the process of
reverting these edits, but this will take a long time.
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
Hello list —
My name is Martijn van Exel, I am on the OSM US board and work at Telenav.
I’ve written to this list a few times before, but this time I am doing so
with my Telenav hat on. Perhaps you know that we have the
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 7:51 PM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote:
Well Kevin,
Well, it seems that the edits from 'OntarioEditor' along the entire 405 were
missed and still have the 'ON' in the ref tag on the ways.
As for the new user doing it, it's 'North American Highways'. I
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CanVec. CanVec data was
converted to OSM format and is stored at
http://ftp2.cits.rncan.gc.ca/OSM/pub/, and is split into files based
on the National Topographic System, and then data was imported in some
parts of Canada by manually cutting and pasting data
at 7:10 PM, Andrew MacKinnon andrew...@gmail.com wrote:
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CanVec. CanVec data was
converted to OSM format and is stored at
http://ftp2.cits.rncan.gc.ca/OSM/pub/, and is split into files based
on the National Topographic System, and then data was imported in some
A lot of the data in Canada was imported from CanVec and Geobase,
some of it by me several years ago. The imported data is pretty poor
quality in many places. I haven't done much work on this recently, as
imports have a bad reputation in OSM and I am mostly concerned with
surveying. For example:
I am proposing that the contact: set of tags (contact:phone,
contact:website, etc.) be depreciated and replaced with the simpler
set of tags (phone, website, etc.) I am not proposing that anyone do
any mechanical edits.
The reason is that the contact: tags are unnecessarily verbose (we
should use
I wouldn't be so sure here.
As an example, there's a bakery chain in the UK called Greggs. They're
mostly tagged shop=bakery (with a few Subway-esque amenity=fast_food /
cuisine=sandwich as well). Occasionally shops like this get wrongly
tagged, sometimes as amenity=cafe, and there's always
On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
A bit of a meta-discussion I wonder why this topic is not going the same
way as the debate on talk-gb last November-December in which it was proposed
to tidy up and normalise various spelling variants? There was a lot
I found a few McDonald's that are not what you think they are. In OSM
there is a McDonald's confectionery shop in Mexico, a McDonald's
supermarket in Missouri, and a McDonald's kitchen store in New
Hampshire that are not fast food restaurants. Looks like you need to
be careful when fixing these.
It is also an easy fallacy to think that if the marketing people of some
chain decide to spell their name differently, we could or should simply
replace all names to what they should be - no we don't, we only change
the name when the store changes its lettering.
Another issue. If a store
I can confirm that McDonald's in Quebec, Canada have an apostrophe
from a Mapillary image of one in Gatineau, QC:
http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/CYy8HTA4MeQouhZ6929gJw. Reason being
that an apostrophe is English but it is allowed in Quebec (at least
nowadays) under French language laws.
I am
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Andrew,
That's a very computer person approach to take. In fact, the
McDonald's issue has already been tried by someone in the past with an
undiscussed mechanical edit, promptly falsifying a few non-chain
non-fastfood
I am trying to figure out a way of cleaning up incorrect chain store
data in OSM. For example there are 1422 instances of McDonalds in
OSM (should be McDonald's) and 203 instances of Tim Horton's (should
be Tim Hortons).
I have created pages on the OSM wiki called
http://www.thestar.com/business/2015/04/06/future-shop-stores-re-open-under-best-buy-name.html
The Future Shop stores that have reopened still have Future Shop
signage but Best Buy signage will replace it soon and the employees
have Best Buy uniforms. The map in this article is based on OSM, but
The former Future Shops that reopened on April 4 are open again. Oddly
enough they still have Future Shop signage though the employees' uniforms
say Best Buy and it appears that the Future Shop signage will be replaced
with Best Buy signage in the next few months. I think it makes sense to use
It looks like all Target stores will close on April 12. I encourage
everyone to help change the Target in your area to shop=vacant, add
shop=vacant Targets that are missing from OSM, update the wiki, and
change the shop=vacant Target in your area to something else if
something else replaces it.
Future Shop has closed all 131 stores in Canada and will replace 65 of
them with Best Buy stores while closing the remainder. I have created
a wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Future_Shop to keep
track of them.
Please help change Future Shops to shop=vacant, add any Future Shops
The Geofabrik address validator (http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/), click
Addresses, is useful for finding these address bugs. There are a lot of
these in Canada. Also there are a lot of roads where the road name on the
road does not match the road name from the address data, in this case a
survey
Target Canada has started closing a significant number of its 133
stores now. I have started to create a list of Target stores in Canada
on the wiki at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Target. Does
anyone want to help (a) change any Target store that has closed to
shop=vacant and (b) add Target
I've noticed that User:Zachary77F has been adding the prefix ON to a
lot of provincial highways in Ontario. I am not sure whether this
makes sense (looks kind of weird on the default Mapnik renderer)
though this convention seems to be used in the US for state highways.
Should I keep provincial
Also this user has been adding A to Quebec autoroutes, R to Quebec
provincial highways, CR to Ontario county roads, etc.
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Andrew MacKinnon andrew...@gmail.com wrote:
I've noticed that User:Zachary77F has been adding the prefix ON to a
lot of provincial highways
Lake Ontario seems to be disappearing whenever I zoom to zoom level 5
or less. I don't see anything wrong on the coastline validator at
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/. Anyone know how to fix this?
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
I have to say that fixing existing Canvec data is a higher priority
than importing new Canvec data. There is a lot of broken Canvec data
that needs fixing, especially in Quebec (particularly the Montreal
area). For instance:
- Address interpolation lines split in half
- Road name does not match
I have been tagging all these Tim Hortons as amenity=cafe. Please note that
Tim Horton's is incorrect, it is Tim Hortons. The one at Yonge/Eglinton
you are referring to is a Tim Hortons/Cold Stone Creamery (only a handful
of locations have a Cold Stone Creamery ice cream shop in them).
Sorry, this source is proprietary, so you can't import it. It is licensed
for non-commercial use only.
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
Just noticed this story on Macrumors:
http://www.macrumors.com/2013/02/22/apple-hiring-maps-ground-truth-data-specialist-in-australia/
Is Apple trying to hire away OSM's top contributors to add data to
their proprietary mapping service?
___
talk
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Duncan Hill dun...@soncan.ca wrote:
I've recently imported some CanVec 10 data into the North Bay, Ontario area.
It's been hard to figure out the best way to do this because of the assorted
versions of existing data in the area. After chatting with some folks in
In my opinion, copying from Google Street View is still a legally
dubious thing to do. There is no formal licensing agreement with
Google that I know of. It is perfectly fine to capture data by taking
pictures yourself, but relying on Google Street View cars to take
those pictures is legally
I strongly suggest to contact DWG and not try to do some clean-up action on
your own.
How certain are you that the source tag refers to the coordinate? Culd also
be the phone number of a shop found by a google search, right?
Each of these occurences has to be checked and the mapper
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Stephan Knauss o...@stephans-server.de wrote:
On 03.11.2012 19:25, Andrew MacKinnon wrote:
Is copying from Google search acceptable anyway?
I say yes. Even this is inferior mapping like any kind of armchair mapping.
Let's assume one enters website addresses
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Steve Doerr doerr.step...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/11/2012 21:31, Andrew MacKinnon wrote:
I am pretty sure that in most of these cases, users are copying from
Google Maps or Google Street View and the data should be deleted. In many
cases, the infringing data
I have discovered a lot of data in OSM that appears to have been
copied from Google Maps. See
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/source#values and type google
into the search box. There appear to be over 3 objects in the OSM
database copied from Google. Anyone willing to help delete data
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Brad Neuhauser brad.neuhau...@gmail.com wrote:
From the dates, it looks like most of those are from the Haiti earthquake
tracing, when Google allowed OSM to use its imagery for tracing. See
Par exemple, un parc devrait-til être name=Jarry Park et name:fr=Parc
Jarry ou simplement name=Parc Jarry? En utilisant OSMAnd~ sur Android
j'ai pensé à ça car ce logiciel offre d'afficher les tags en anglais ou
autres. Peut être avec un autre niveau d'impact, est-ce qu'on doit
utiliser
OK I've figured it out.
In the City of Toronto, there are numerous duplicate street names
caused by amalgamation. See
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/ontroads/message/9826. If
there is a duplicate street name, you must use the name of the former
municipality in the address e.g. York, East
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Steve Singer st...@ssinger.info wrote:
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Andrew MacKinnon wrote:
OK I've figured it out.
Is a free source available for the boundaries of Old Toronto, North
York, York and East York as they existed before 1998? I have added the
boundaries
Just noticed that user:postmaster added some data from source city of
hamilton property map
http://map.hamilton.ca/InteractiveMaps/framesetup.asp;, obviously a
newbie.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/10042572
Presumably this is a copyright violation?
I just noticed a bunch of bulk edits done a while ago by
User:JohnSmith in downtown Toronto, which are not ODBL compliant
(User:JohnSmith seems to refused the CT). These appear to be large
bulk edits which were made worldwide. This user seems to have made
bulk modifications to the tagging of
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:15 PM, James A. Treacy tre...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 10:30:34PM -0400, Andrew MacKinnon wrote:
Given that this sort of work is time consuming it will take a while to
finish. However, 99% of the work that requires importing coastlines
from CanVec
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 12:49 AM, G. Michael Carter
mikeycarter1...@gmail.com wrote:
Any eta on when you'll be finish with the lake Ontario coastline?
Oshawa to Kingston is 99% done. (The Bay of Quinte took a very long
time to do, but is done now.)
Oshawa to Hamilton is in progress, using Bing
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:23 AM, G. Michael Carter
mi...@carterfamily.ca wrote:
Andrew,
In addition to the missing lakes and marshes documented on talk-ca here's
another if your keeping a list:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=43.98365lon=-77.7393zoom=17layers=M
Also as another FYI you may
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:57 PM, James A. Treacy tre...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 07:07:37PM -0700, Adam Dunn wrote:
I've done a cursory examination of the Oshawa Harbour, and it would
appear that there are two ways defining the water's edge:
1.) a PGS Coastline import, which
Will you be continuing? I've been on a roll and would be willing to
continue into Lake Ontario, but as you've started it is only fair to
let you continue if you wish.
If you wish to continue, I'll just work on another area. There is a
tricky part between Lake Huron and Lake Erie that I've
Sorry about this.
I accidentally imported duplicate features in 031G09.1.3 (Lachute)
that should be removed now unless I missed a few.
Lachute seemed to have been mostly mapped by a user called JeanRob98
in 2009 (badly - there were many roads missing the street type such as
Rue etc., there were
Found an interesting use of OpenStreetMap data - Sarah Thompson's
mayoral campaign is using it to display a proposed network of bike
lanes in Toronto:
http://sarahthomson.ca/blog/sarah-thomsons-bike-city
___
Talk-ca mailing list
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Steve Singer ssinger...@sympatico.ca wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Bégin, Daniel wrote:
Hi all,
Actually, Canvec files conversion is completed!
Thanks for all your work on this and keeping the community involved at each
step. Also thanks to NRCan for
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Bégin, Daniel
daniel.be...@rncan-nrcan.gc.ca wrote:
Hi Mike,
You did not miss anything, you are giving comments on a sample - as expected!
- About missing names, Canvec features are not named. However you can find
some toponyms.
- About missing tags on
Just noticed that Google is now showing what is essentially GeoBase
data on Google Maps Canada. There seem to be a lot of errors (e.g.
buildings that have been demolished, missing roads such as the Highway
410 extension). Pretty terrible effort on the part of Google, let's do
better with OSM.
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Robert Shand b...@shand.org.uk wrote:
I would tend to agree with this, as I have spotted street view imagery
having been doctored. I used to live on a one-way street, and the
imagery in Street View clearly showed the SV car travelling in the wrong
direction on
not importing it at all.
Since this is such a complex job, I think that we need to arrange some
sort of meetup (either in person or on IRC) to discuss how we will do
this import.
Andrew MacKinnon
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Take another look. Parts of the road centreline data are at least
years out of date. And the centerline data freely mixes roads with
geographic boundaries with rivers, some sharing junctions. That'll
be a mess to convert
The City of Toronto aerial imagery WMS server URL (for JOSM) is at
(remember the last ):
http://map.toronto.ca/servlet/com.esri.wms.Esrimap/OrthoImagery?REQUEST=GetMapSERVICE=WMSVERSION=1.1.1LAYERS=Ortho
Imagery 50cm
2005STYLES=FORMAT=image/pngBGCOLOR=0xFFTRANSPARENT=TRUESRS=EPSG:4326
It
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Sam Vekemans
acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Andrew MacKinnon andrew...@gmail.com
wrote:
The TTC data is pretty much useless to us because it is in a weird
non-documented format. Would the TTC be willing to allow us to copy
Wholesale deletion of the work of many volunteers without their
consent seems even less likely to generate a positive outcome. I
would consider that wholesale deletion to be vandalism.
I strongly agree. Manually edited data should never be removed and
replaced automatically with a data
Found some more:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/2365004
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/2364986
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/2364907
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/2364884
Not 100% sure they are vandalism since they are in B.C., but I
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/2365099
Can someone please revert and block this user? This is a repeat offender.
Andrew MacKinnon
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
This is a proposal for a generic way of tagging a node which
represents an object which faces a certain way - e.g. a traffic sign
such as a stop sign. Note this is not a specific proposal on how to
tag signs of a certain type, only a generic relation which can be used
for all objects of this type.
I have noticed several dubious edits in the Toronto area by
User:Yathusan. They are all very inaccurate and have no GPS traces
supporting them, and I suspect that they are vandalism (but I am not
sure, they might just be very inaccurately done legitimate edits).
I am wondering about how pedestrian and car entrances to parking
garages should be tagged. For instance, there are two large
underground parking garages in Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario,
one new and one relatively old. Each is located underneath an outdoor
playing field and has several
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 12:34 AM, Jason Reid
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard Weait wrote:
Dear all,
I had a look at campus maps on the web sites of the Big Ten Conference
universities. I was surprised at the range in quality. See my notes
and comparisons to how the OpenStreetMap community
Recently, it appears that Mapnik has started rendering the name of
relations on the map, as if they were street names. For example, it
renders the name of the Cosburn bus route along Haldon Avenue in
this map: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=43.6978lon=-79.31117zoom=17.
This is clearly
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 4:24 AM, Remco van Zuijlen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just got this 'press release' from AND:
Mapmaker AND releases new version of Map 2.0
It's Netherlands only. Why not just redirect users to OSM, given that
AND gave OSM this data last year? This is copyright AND and
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 7:07 PM, Charles Basenga Kiyanda
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Parking lots of this kind are common enough (in inner cities) that
they have
their own official traffic sign (number 9 at [1]), but there's
currently no
good way to tag them.
We have similar (but more
The Mapnik layer of the slippy map is currently broken. No map data is
shown on recently rendered tiles (coastline data appears to be there).
Please fix ASAP.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Richard Fairhurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nic Roets wrote:
If someone made the effort to physically survey it and properly tag
it, I think it's OK.
Maintainability is probably a bigger issue than notability. Roads,
railways and canals don't move much,
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 1:14 PM, OJ W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to turn off map data on potlatch, for when you want to
zoom-out and look at something on the satellite photos, but don't want
to trouble OSM with downloading an entire town's data that you're not
planning to use?
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Robin Paulson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/5/3 micha ruh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
in options, choose 'Aerial - OpenAerialMap' as background and you'll be fine
hmm, i'm slightly baffled by that. the oam coverage for nz is
appalling at best and as an aside, i'd be
Looking at Google Maps today, I noticed that they added the subway
stations in Toronto, Canada. But most of them are in the wrong place -
sometimes up to 2km away from the correct location - or missing
completely.
On Feb 9, 2008 10:36 AM, Gervase Markham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mikel Maron wrote:
It's still going on and we need a technical solution, now. Dialogue has
not been effective and banning users is not effective.
Banning users is not effective because they just sign up with new accounts?
On Jan 29, 2008 4:43 PM, Igor Brejc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there somewhere a repository of totally free general-purpose icons
such as this? I'm asking because I would like to extend Kosmos rendering
rules with some nice icons.
Try openclipart.org. There's lots of clip art there that might
86 matches
Mail list logo