I didn't check all those tags, but that's probably how it should be done
indeed technically, as Lionel said. Drawing 4 parking spaces is much easier.
And easier to understand for less experienced mappers. Which is also a good
argument, IMHO. We don't want to create a database which is too
so for https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/tyzRIji1MXSDUcxAxoxFoQ (the
spot from the previous mail)
parking:lane:both=marked
parking:lane:left:type=on_kerb (*)
parking:lane:right:type=half_on_kerb (*)
parking:lane:right:capacity=2
parking:lane:left:capacity=2
parking:condition:both=free
(*)
Yes technically this is how to map it (at least how it is documented), and
using the mandatory tag "parking:condition" in combination give indication
for people looking at roadside parking (one viewer show these :
https://zlant.github.io/parking-lanes/#15/50.9452/3.1233 with Roeselare as
a
So for those 4 roadside parking spaces: https://osm.org/go/0EpBwBaxP?m=
I have to split the road a couple of times, add some 3 or 4 parking
lane tags to indicate it is somehow on both sides, parallel parking in
marked spots? And I wouldn't be able to add the capacity in the end.
While adding 4
