So for those 4 roadside parking spaces: https://osm.org/go/0EpBwBaxP?m= I have to split the road a couple of times, add some 3 or 4 parking lane tags to indicate it is somehow on both sides, parallel parking in marked spots? And I wouldn't be able to add the capacity in the end.
While adding 4 rectangles with tag amenity=parking_space express the same? For me, there is definitely improvement possible in the tagging schema for such situations. m. On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 9:26 AM Lionel Giard <lionel.gi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > @Marc These parking along street are indeed often not "amenity=parking" but > probably more related to parking:lane tag (tagged on the highway itself). > Technically it is suggested to only map these kind of roadside parking with > the parking:lane tag on the street. > But yes, it could be mapped with amenity=parking_space (without > amenity=parking around it). and we could maybe use the > "type=site"+"site=parking" relation to group them (as it is suggested for > complex parking lot already) and allow people to understand that it is linked > to the road (including the street line in the relation) and that it is > roadside parking. But it is undocumented to use it that way. ^^ > > Le mar. 5 nov. 2019 à 08:42, Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> a écrit : >> >> Ik map soms ook parkeerplaatsen in een straat met enkel >> amenity=parking_space, omdat er geen parking (in de betekenis van >> parkeerterrein) is. >> Ik vind niet dat elke groep van een paar parkeerplaatsen in een straat >> parkings zijn. En het wordt gerenderd, dus kan je je afvragen of de >> wiki niet moet aangepast worden voor zulke gevallen ? >> >> m. _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
