Re: [OSM-talk-be] Beginning with survey new "Fietsknooppunten West-Vlaanderen"

There is also http://osma.vmarc.be which does a great work regarding quality analysis of a node network. > On 11 Mar 2016, at 17:10, Jakka wrote: > > Jo schreef op 11/03/2016 om 13:52: >> It's been a long while since I worked on those cycle and

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Beginning with survey new "Fietsknooppunten West-Vlaanderen"

Jo schreef op 11/03/2016 om 13:52: It's been a long while since I worked on those cycle and walking networks. I'm rather busy with a GSoC project for a better plugin to help with mapping of Public Transport and all these Missing Maps Mapathons and mapping/validating for HOT lately. Are you

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Beginning with survey new "Fietsknooppunten West-Vlaanderen"

It's been a long while since I worked on those cycle and walking networks. I'm rather busy with a GSoC project for a better plugin to help with mapping of Public Transport and all these Missing Maps Mapathons and mapping/validating for HOT lately. Are you using the script I created a few years

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Beginning with survey new "Fietsknooppunten West-Vlaanderen"

On Friday 11 March 2016 10:59:56 Jakka wrote: > [...] > The new node 85 over the bridge to north is also divided to avoid > crossing roads. > > These examples are with two mean node of same number. I thing there will > be others with more node of the same mean node... > > Thinking the new

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Beginning with survey new "Fietsknooppunten West-Vlaanderen"

marcv schreef op 11/03/2016 om 11:39: Jakka, How do we deal with this. What are the networknodes called on the guideposts on the ground? If the name of the networknode on the guidepost is called "09", then I think it should be mapped with that name in OSM (and not "09_1" and "09_2"), even

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Beginning with survey new "Fietsknooppunten West-Vlaanderen"

Jakka, How do we deal with this. What are the networknodes called on the guideposts on the ground? If the name of the networknode on the guidepost is called "09", then I think it should be mapped with that name in OSM (and not "09_1" and "09_2"), even if there are multiple physical

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Beginning with survey new "Fietsknooppunten West-Vlaanderen"

Perhaps Jo is willing to set up a hangout or something similar to explain the mapping in detail. But as a starter you could read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cycle_Node_Network_Tagging regards m On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Jakka wrote: > Beginning with survey

[OSM-talk-be] Beginning with survey new "Fietsknooppunten West-Vlaanderen"

Beginning with survey new "Fietsknooppunten West-Vlaanderen" used "source=survey march 2016" http://osma.vmarc.be/nl/route/1422666 https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/50.8023539398/3.186852321838684 08-09 the nine is split in two point "fork" 09_1 (I called it) driving left under the