Sorry, for bringing up this topic in the first place. I thought that a new
consensus on mapping regional mapping networks was reached, since an
experienced mapper was using it.
While I understand that there are pros and cons on the documented method and
Gerard's method, I continue to use the
Hi Marc,
2011/10/12 Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com
Sorry, for bringing up this topic in the first place. I thought that a new
consensus on mapping regional mapping networks was reached, since an
experienced mapper was using it.
Don't feel sorry. The only way to get forward and improve is
Oops, hadn't seen Eimai's message on trac and added one of my own:
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/4017
No idea if this will resolve anything, but we can at least try.
Cheers,
Jo
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 02:46:35 Gerard Vanderveken wrote:
I believe the Wiki should be changed and in stead of the node tag, a
name or ref tag should be used.
We've talked about this issue so often now, and we keep having the same
problem with the name or ref tags: it's not those routes'
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 13:05:30 Jo wrote:
I suppose the ref tag might be more appropriate. It is indeed a bit odd to
use note for it, OTOH that's the only tag that was used consistently in all
the 1000s of relations I've seen so far...
Me removing the names on those route relations made
2011/10/11 Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 13:05:30 Jo wrote:
I suppose the ref tag might be more appropriate. It is indeed a bit odd
to
use note for it, OTOH that's the only tag that was used consistently in
all
the 1000s of relations I've seen so far...
Me
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 15:21:47 Jo wrote:
Maybe the fact that this discussion seems to recur every so often is an
indicator that something is not logical about it.
Since these routes ultimately have to be entered by people and these people
make a choice, which is not easily altered (I
Ben Laenen wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 15:21:47 Jo wrote:
Maybe the fact that this discussion seems to recur every so often is an
indicator that something is not logical about it.
Since these routes ultimately have to be entered by people and these people
make a choice, which is not
Ben Laenen wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 16:49:00 Gerard Vanderveken wrote:
We want to tag for the people and for usabillity.
The current reasoning is flawed.
-The route between 2 points in a network has no name, so we do not tag a
name in OSM.
Congratulations. Now if only we
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 19:58:39 Gerard Vanderveken wrote:
If you don't want to use the name tag, because that name might be
rendered, and then put it in the note tag, you are also tagging for
(against) the renderers.
Exactly as the objection of Eimai is in the trac
On Monday 10 October 2011 21:19:56 Marc Gemis wrote:
I use both openwandelkaart and Lonvia to check my edits. Recently, I
noticed that some walking networks are rendered differently in Lonvia. The
routes have a rectangle with 2 characters (ZD - Zuid-Dijleland and KH -
Kempische Heuvelrug).
Ben Laenen wrote:
On Monday 10 October 2011 21:19:56 Marc Gemis wrote:
I use both openwandelkaart and Lonvia to check my edits. Recently, I
noticed that some walking networks are rendered differently in Lonvia. The
routes have a rectangle with 2 characters (ZD - Zuid-Dijleland and KH -
12 matches
Mail list logo
