It's indeed due to a bad import job. Partly the data is probably to
blame as well , since it comes from building DB it's marked as a
building but in OSM it should be turned into man_made=*
Whenever you find dutch in the values of a building or man_made key,
chances are very high that they come
tip: iets ten westen en oosten van jouw staketsel, zijn er 2 meertjes in
een bos. Momenteel worden daar ook boompjes op getekend, omdat er geen
multi-polygoon gedefinieerd is voor het bos.
Heb je zin om dat te corrigeren ? Weet je hoe je een multi-polygoon moet
maken ? Vraag het anders maar, laat
@Ruben: I will fix when I come upon one.
@Steven: I think I didn't notice because the rendering-color is the same
as the 'unmapped area' around the nearby footpath
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/517185144)
Pieter Brusselman
/Cartografie ~ Projectmedewerker/
(logo boompja)
Strange, because http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465851481 renders
perfectly.
2017-10-18 14:47 GMT+02:00 Ruben :
> On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 10:04:01 +0200, Pieter Brusselman <
> pieter.brussel...@tragewegen.be> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Some time ago I mapped some 'man_made =
On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 10:04:01 +0200, Pieter Brusselman
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some time ago I mapped some 'man_made = pier' on the Zuidlede. Those
> items don't show up on the map. Perhaps due to the rendering_style.
>
> I was looking for some examples and i found:
A man_made=pier should be rendered on the default style, see e.g.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22909776#map=18/51.08352/4.36580
Adding building is wrong. I don't know whether a pier mapped as an area
will show up though. Perhaps one could add area=yes.
Can you include a link to the Pier in
Hi,
Some time ago I mapped some 'man_made = pier' on the Zuidlede. Those
items don't show up on the map. Perhaps due to the rendering_style.
I was looking for some examples and i found:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7340858#map=18/51.0/3.73357.
Here, the pier/staketsel is