On 2017-09-27 05:49 PM, Matthew Darwin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are any Canadian folks going to State of the Map US October 20-22
> https://2017.stateofthemap.us/
Nope. Wish I could afford it.
> During the conference, I would like to have a discussion about turning
> the informal
On 2017-09-27 07:00 PM, john whelan wrote:
> No we need to persuade the municipalities to move to the new standard
> license in the TB kit
Is this initiative published anywhere, John? I virtually attended the
conference it was supposed to be announced at, and all there is is
Jean-NoƩ's
municipalities will follow what the federal is doing. ideally everything
would be public domain, but that would be a utopian world. forget them
switching to ODbL, most people have no idea about it and is very
restrictive when you want to change licenses in the future.
On Sep 27, 2017 7:01 PM,
No we need to persuade the municipalities to move to the new standard
license in the TB kit and I think Stats will have better success that we
will in the first instance also Open-Ouvert could probably let us know
which municipalities have expressed an interest in the new license.
Cheerio John
It's still a different license for each city, province, or organisation,
and the current opinion is that each different license needs to go through
the same multi-month review to be approved for OSM.
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 3:48 PM, john whelan wrote:
> T.B. have what
T.B. have what they call a Municipal Open Data kit which basically has the
same license as the city of Ottawa uses plus how to use it.
Cheerio John
On 27 September 2017 at 18:40, Stewart Russell wrote:
> But they can't use OGL-CA v2 cos municipalities aren't federal. And
>
Stewart i meant a license based on v2. As toronto is based on v1
On Sep 27, 2017 6:40 PM, "Stewart Russell" wrote:
> But they can't use OGL-CA v2 cos municipalities aren't federal. And
> anything but the actual few already approved licences need a multi-month
> review.
>
>
But they can't use OGL-CA v2 cos municipalities aren't federal. And
anything but the actual few already approved licences need a multi-month
review.
Stewart
On Sep 27, 2017 18:28, "James" wrote:
> other then have them change their license from say ogl-ca v1 to ogl-cav2
>
>How do we want to move this discussion forward? Do we need to set up a
time to talk on the phone? I am willing to help coordinate logistics.
I think we need a contact at Stats and since Bjenk has left I'm not sure
who is doing what. Alessandro is more management overview than a working
contact
other then have them change their license from say ogl-ca v1 to ogl-cav2
theres not much we can do from a legal stand point. ogl-ca v1 puts too many
restrictions
On Sep 27, 2017 6:21 PM, "Matthew Darwin" wrote:
> How do we want to move this discussion forward? Do we need
How do we want to move this discussion forward? Do we need to set up
a time to talk on the phone? I am willing to help coordinate logistics.
On 2017-09-17 10:55 AM, Stewart C. Russell wrote:
On 2017-09-17 10:40 AM, john whelan wrote:
They'd like to extend it across Canada so now might be the
Hi,
Are any Canadian folks going to State of the Map US October 20-22
https://2017.stateofthemap.us/
During the conference, I would like to have a discussion about turning
the informal https://www.osmcanada.ca/ into a not-for-profit Canadian
corporation. I'm looking for other folks who
12 matches
Mail list logo