other then have them change their license from say ogl-ca v1 to ogl-cav2 theres not much we can do from a legal stand point. ogl-ca v1 puts too many restrictions
On Sep 27, 2017 6:21 PM, "Matthew Darwin" <[email protected]> wrote: > How do we want to move this discussion forward? Do we need to set up a > time to talk on the phone? I am willing to help coordinate logistics. > > On 2017-09-17 10:55 AM, Stewart C. Russell wrote: > >> On 2017-09-17 10:40 AM, john whelan wrote: >> >>> They'd like to extend it across Canada so now might be the time to think >>> about the project. >>> >> That sounds good. Despite some prodding, the Licence Working Group (LWG) >> hasn't got back to me with any updates on how they want to handle the >> Toronto or Ontario licences. I first contacted them in March, so if it >> takes them six months or more to look at the licence, then this import >> is a multi year (if not multi-decade) project. Remember, LWG has decided >> that *every* Canadian licence variant needs their sign-off. >> >> Denis Carr (open data lead) from Toronto has been on board since the >> spring, and I hope hasn't forgotten us. >> >> Toronto has nice building outlines (embedded in the 3D Massing data set, >> so we can pull out base elevation and height). We also have address >> points already in the middle of buildings. >> >> It also is of great help that the Esri Community Imagery includes some >> very nice municipal air photos for verification. >> >> Stewart >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-ca mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >> > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
