If it becomes over 2000 nodes in a single "way" or shape, it's recommended
to make it a multipolygon. The reason NRCan does this is probably because
it's on the edge of what they call "NTS Tiles" which is a grid that
organizes the data (see forests in Canada
Hello
I am a contributor from Toronto and I have a question regarding how to
treat some of the CanVec 6.0 - NRCan imports, specifically for lakes.
I came across this lake here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/69275451
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/69277932
On Jan 19, 2019, at 10:48 AM, john whelan wrote:
> There was an earlier discussion on talk-ca about how to handle this project.
There were MANY. Speaking for myself only, I urged a very cautious, go-slow
approach, to edit the data into "improvement / harmony-with-OSM" as much as
possible
There was an earlier discussion on talk-ca about how to handle this
project.
It is similar to CANVEC in the original data sources are municipal data
CANVEC uses a few other sources as well and it is released under exactly
the same license but by a different federal government department.
There
Plusieurs (et j'en suis) ont exprimé leur désir d'avoir une meilleure
couverture de forêt sur la carte OSM. Ces zones de forêt sont venues avec les
importations CanVec mais ne progressent plus depuis un certain temps. Le
présent article propose une façon de réaliser la forêt sans utiliser les abus
Sur le blog de la Fondation OSM, on remerciait hier la dynamique association de
Pau, dans les Pyrénées françaises pour l'installation d'un serveur de tuiles
OSM. Ce serveur est devenue officiellement hier un serveur de cache de tuiles
d'OpenStreetMap couvrant la France , l'Espagne, le Portugal,
Could you please unsubscribe me?
Thank you!
--
Clément Le Quintrec | (514) 692 8341 |
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
I'm doing some work in the Washington State and noticed some problems along
the border between BC and Washington State. I asked for help on the talk-us
mailing list.
I originally though the border was incorrect. However, because the border
doesn't track exactly along the 49th parallel there
Pierre
I beg to differ, the OSM wiki states The place=locality tag can be
used to name unpopulated place which is not associated with any
feature to which such a tag could be associated.
By default many small or unpopulated places are tagged as localities
in canvec. When I preformed the upload
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Sam Dyck samueld...@gmail.com wrote:
I beg to differ, the OSM wiki states The place=locality tag can be
used to name unpopulated place which is not associated with any
feature to which such a tag could be associated.
By default many small or unpopulated
Actually both of the highway locations I cited are not from any
database, but reflect the local names for the intersection.
On 2/23/12, Gordon Dewis gor...@pinetree.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Sam Dyck samueld...@gmail.com wrote:
I beg to differ, the OSM wiki states The
Confusion Corner reminded me of The Basketweave on the 401 in Toronto.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=43.71829lon=-79.50048zoom=17layers=M
Here a mapper has tagged the node as an attraction.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Sam Dyck samueld...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually both of the highway
Sent: January 26, 2009 6:42 PM
To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-ca] (no subject)
Hi
What's with the Geobase import of Lorette, MB? The roads are tagged as admin.
boundries.
hr
emPlease avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word
13 matches
Mail list logo
