Re: [Talk-ca] GeoBase2osm canvec2osm script making

2009-02-13 Thread Sam Vekemans
Thanks,Well, it might not help as much as i thought. Anyway, I'm wondering about weather or not your planning on having another script that would be able to import the road names? .. . or you think it would be better off that they get manually entered in, from survey? I guess that as long as the

Re: [Talk-ca] GeoBase2osm canvec2osm script making

2009-02-13 Thread Sam Vekemans
Hi, if you can post your custom script to the SVN, and add a README.txt and state your copyright of cc-sa, it would alow me and others to 'pick and choose' and help make the script more user friendly :-) you can also post your file on that file sharing site (that u posted your osm files on) -it

Re: [Talk-ca] GeoBase2osm canvec2osm script making

2009-02-13 Thread Richard Degelder
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 02:52 -0800, Sam Vekemans wrote: Thanks, Well, it might not help as much as i thought. Anyway, I'm wondering about weather or not your planning on having another script that would be able to import the road names? .. . or you think it would be better off that they get

[Talk-ca] GeoBase2osm canvec2osm script making

2009-02-12 Thread Sam Vekemans
Hi John,Great work, :) So i'm working with Ian Dees, (who created) shp2osm and trying to figure out how to make this happen. The CanVec shape files are similar, in that it's the same process of converting, accept that there are no duplicated to contend with. My approach is this: I can now

Re: [Talk-ca] geobase2osm

2008-12-26 Thread Richard Degelder
Jason, I looked up your script geobase2osm and noted several things. The README states that this is not ready for production work yet which is fine. But at the same time I also noticed that at no point have you given a license to the script, neither in the README nor within the script itself.

Re: [Talk-ca] geobase2osm

2008-12-26 Thread Jason Reid
Richard Degelder wrote: Jason, I looked up your script geobase2osm and noted several things. The README states that this is not ready for production work yet which is fine. But at the same time I also noticed that at no point have you given a license to the script, neither in the README